ArticlePloS one2016
Structure-Based Analysis Reveals Cancer Missense Mutations Target Protein Interaction Interfaces.
Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
52 citing papers in PubMed, 93 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring proteins and protein-ligand complexes through residue interaction networks.Nature protocols · 2026Review
- Graph and Hypergraph Theories Applied to Dynamic Protein-Protein Interaction Network Analysis, and Deep-Learning Frameworks for Protein Complex Network Prediction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- DBP-CanPred: a machine learning model for predicting cancer-causing mutations in DNA-binding proteins.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Global profiling of protein complex dynamics with an experimental library of protein interaction markers.Nature biotechnology · 2025Article
- Molecular insights into TP53 mutation (p. Arg267Trp) and its connection to Choroid Plexus Carcinomas and Li-Fraumeni Syndrome.Genes & genomics · 2024Article
- Interface-guided phenotyping of coding variants in the transcription factor RUNX1.Cell reports · 2024Article
- Discovering predisposing genes for hereditary breast cancer using deep learning.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Computational analysis of protein-protein interactions of cancer drivers in renal cell carcinoma.FEBS open bio · 2024Article
- Distinct mutational processes shape selection of MHC class I and class II mutations across primary and metastatic tumors.Cell reports · 2023Article
- Missense3D-PPI: A Web Resource to Predict the Impact of Missense Variants at Protein Interfaces Using 3D Structural Data.Journal of molecular biology · 2023Article
- Topological data analysis of protein structure and inter/intra-molecular interaction changes attributable to amino acid mutations.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Article
- Computed cancer interactome explains the effects of somatic mutations in cancers.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2022Article
- CRISPR-based oligo recombineering prioritizes apicomplexan cysteines for drug discovery.Nature microbiology · 2022Article
- Predicting functional consequences of mutations using molecular interaction network features.Human genetics · 2022Article
- A machine learning algorithm with subclonal sensitivity reveals widespread pan-cancer human leukocyte antigen loss of heterozygosity.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Disease-specific interactome alterations via epichaperomics: the case for Alzheimer's disease.The FEBS journal · 2022Review
- The properties of human disease mutations at protein interfaces.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Interfacial Peptides as Affinity Modulating Agents of Protein-Protein Interactions.Biomolecules · 2022Review
- A full-proteome, interaction-specific characterization of mutational hotspots across human cancers.Genome research · 2022Article
- Network-based protein-protein interaction prediction method maps perturbations of cancer interactome.PLoS genetics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Recently it has been shown that cancer mutations selectively target protein-protein interactions. We hypothesized that mutations affecting distinct protein interactions involving established cancer genes could contribute to tumor heterogeneity, and that novel mechanistic insights might be gained into tumorigenesis by investigating protein interactions under positive selection in cancer. To identify protein interactions under positive selection in cancer, we mapped over 1.2 million nonsynonymous somatic cancer mutations onto 4,896 experimentally determined protein structures and analyzed their spatial distribution. In total, 20% of mutations on the surface of known cancer genes perturbed protein-protein interactions (PPIs), and this enrichment for PPI interfaces was observed for both tumor suppressors (Odds Ratio 1.28, P-value < 10(-4)) and oncogenes (Odds Ratio 1.17, P-value < 10(-3)). To study this further, we constructed a bipartite network representing structurally resolved PPIs from all available human complexes in the Protein Data Bank (2,864 proteins, 3,072 PPIs). Analysis of frequently mutated cancer genes within this network revealed that tumor-suppressors, but not oncogenes, are significantly enriched with functional mutations in homo-oligomerization regions (Odds Ratio 3.68, P-Value < 10(-8)). We present two important examples, TP53 and beta-2-microglobulin, for which the patterns of somatic mutations at interfaces provide insights into specifically perturbed biological circuits. In patients with TP53 mutations, patient survival correlated with the specific interactions that were perturbed. Moreover, we investigated mutations at the interface of protein-nucleotide interactions and observed an unexpected number of missense mutations but not silent mutations occurring within DNA and RNA binding sites. Finally, we provide a resource of 3,072 PPI interfaces ranked according to their mutation rates. Analysis of this list highlights 282 novel candidate cancer genes that encode proteins participating in interactions that are perturbed recurrently across tumors. In summary, mutation of specific protein interactions is an important contributor to tumor heterogeneity and may have important implications for clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.