Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27043210›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Structure-Based Analysis Reveals Cancer Missense Mutations Target Protein Interaction Interfaces.

H Billur Engin, Jason F Kreisberg, Hannah Carter

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Computed cancer interactome explains the effects of somatic mutations in cancers.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

H Billur EnginDivision of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr., La Jolla, CA, 92093, United States of America.
Jason F KreisbergDivision of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr., La Jolla, CA, 92093, United States of America.
Hannah CarterDivision of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr., La Jolla, CA, 92093, United States of America.
University of California, San Diego · US

Funding

SYNTHETIC SYSTEMSP50GM085764 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI SUEL, GUROL MEHMET · 2010 to 2018
$23.3M
Network approaches to identify cancer drivers from high-dimensional tumor dataDP5OD017937 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI CARTER, HANNAH KATHRYN · 2013 to 2017
$1.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM085764NIH HHS DP5 OD017937NIH HHS DP5 OD017937-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently it has been shown that cancer mutations selectively target protein-protein interactions. We hypothesized that mutations affecting distinct protein interactions involving established cancer genes could contribute to tumor heterogeneity, and that novel mechanistic insights might be gained into tumorigenesis by investigating protein interactions under positive selection in cancer. To identify protein interactions under positive selection in cancer, we mapped over 1.2 million nonsynonymous somatic cancer mutations onto 4,896 experimentally determined protein structures and analyzed their spatial distribution. In total, 20% of mutations on the surface of known cancer genes perturbed protein-protein interactions (PPIs), and this enrichment for PPI interfaces was observed for both tumor suppressors (Odds Ratio 1.28, P-value < 10(-4)) and oncogenes (Odds Ratio 1.17, P-value < 10(-3)). To study this further, we constructed a bipartite network representing structurally resolved PPIs from all available human complexes in the Protein Data Bank (2,864 proteins, 3,072 PPIs). Analysis of frequently mutated cancer genes within this network revealed that tumor-suppressors, but not oncogenes, are significantly enriched with functional mutations in homo-oligomerization regions (Odds Ratio 3.68, P-Value < 10(-8)). We present two important examples, TP53 and beta-2-microglobulin, for which the patterns of somatic mutations at interfaces provide insights into specifically perturbed biological circuits. In patients with TP53 mutations, patient survival correlated with the specific interactions that were perturbed. Moreover, we investigated mutations at the interface of protein-nucleotide interactions and observed an unexpected number of missense mutations but not silent mutations occurring within DNA and RNA binding sites. Finally, we provide a resource of 3,072 PPI interfaces ranked according to their mutation rates. Analysis of this list highlights 282 novel candidate cancer genes that encode proteins participating in interactions that are perturbed recurrently across tumors. In summary, mutation of specific protein interactions is an important contributor to tumor heterogeneity and may have important implications for clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularMutation, MissenseProtein ConformationProtein Interaction MapsBinding SitesComputational BiologyDatabases, GeneticHumansMutant ProteinsNeoplasmsProtein BindingProtein Interaction MappingProtein MultimerizationStructure-Activity RelationshipTumor Suppressor Protein p53Mutant ProteinsTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID27043210
PMCPMC4820104
OpenAlexW2331480251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.