Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27042841›Full record

ReviewBone marrow transplantation2016

Italian consensus conference for the outpatient autologous stem cell transplantation management in multiple myeloma.

M Martino, R M Lemoli, C Girmenia, L Castagna, B Bruno, F Cavallo, M Offidani, I Scortechini, M Montanari, G Milone and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Bone marrow transplantation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Small Centers with Big Ventures: Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation Survival DataAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

M MartinoDipartimento di Onco-Ematologia, Ematologia con Trapianto di Midollo Osseo, Azienda Ospedaliera BMM, Reggio Calabria, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3987-419X
R M LemoliCattedra di Ematologia, Dipartimento di Medicina Interna e Specialità Mediche, Università di Genova, Genova, Italy.
C GirmeniaDipartimento di Biotecnologie Cellulari ed Ematologia, Policlinico Umberto I, "Università la Sapienza", Roma, Italy.
L CastagnaHumanitas Cancer Center, Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Rozzano (MI), Italy.
B BrunoDivision of Hematology, A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, and Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.
F CavalloDivision of Hematology, A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, and Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.
M OffidaniClinica di Ematologia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona, Italy.
I ScortechiniClinica di Ematologia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona, Italy.
M MontanariClinica di Ematologia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona, Italy.
G MiloneUnità Trapianto di Midollo Osseo, Dipartimento di Ematologia, Azienda Ospedaliera Policlinico Vittorio Emanuele, Catania, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7840-4414
L PostacchiniClinica Medica Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona, Italy.
A OlivieriClinica di Ematologia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona, Italy.
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino · ITAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico - Vittorio Emanuele · ITFondazione Humanitas per la Ricerca · ITPoliclinico Umberto I · ITUniversity of Genoa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple myeloma (MM) is the leading indication for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) worldwide. The safety and efficacy of reducing hospital stay for MM patients undergoing ASCT have been widely explored, and different outpatient models have been proposed. However, there is no agreement on the criteria for selecting patients eligible for this strategy as well as the standards for their clinical management. On the basis of this rationale, the Italian Group for Stem Cell Transplantation (GITMO) endorsed a project to develop guidelines for the management of outpatient ASCT in MM, using evidence-based knowledge and consensus-formation techniques. An expert panel convened to discuss the currently available data on the practice of outpatient ASCT management and formulated recommendations according to the supporting evidence. Evidence gaps were filled with consensus-based statements. Three main topics were addressed: (1) the identification of criteria for selecting MM patients eligible for outpatient ASCT management; (2) the definition of standard procedures for performing outpatient ASCT (model, supportive care and monitoring during the aplastic phase); (3) the definition of the standard criteria and procedures for re-hospitalization during the aplastic phase at home. Herein, we report the summary and the results of the discussion and the consensus.

Indexed as

ConsensusOutpatientsTransplantation, AutologousClinical ProtocolsConsensus Statements as TopicHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHospitalizationHumansItalyMultiple MyelomaPatient SelectionPractice Guidelines as Topic

Identifiers

PMID27042841
OpenAlexW2340717702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.