Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27042697›Full record

ArticleCurrent cellular biochemistry

Differential nuclear staining assay for high-throughput screening to identify cytotoxic compounds.

Carolina Lema, Armando Varela-Ramirez, Renato J Aguilera

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current cellular biochemistry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Anticancer Therapies Based on Oxidative Damage:Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The Antiproliferative Effect of Chloroform Fraction ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carolina LemaUniversity of Texas at El Paso, Department of Biological Sciences, Bioscience Research Building, 500 West University Ave. El Paso, Texas 79968-0519, USA.
Armando Varela-RamirezUniversity of Texas at El Paso, Department of Biological Sciences, Bioscience Research Building, 500 West University Ave. El Paso, Texas 79968-0519, USA.
Renato J AguileraUniversity of Texas at El Paso, Department of Biological Sciences, Bioscience Research Building, 500 West University Ave. El Paso, Texas 79968-0519, USA.
The University of Texas at El Paso · US

Funding

TOXICOLOGY PROJECTG12RR008124 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS EL PASO · PI WALSH, ELIZABETH J · 1992 to 2011
$20.8M
TCCG12MD007592 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS EL PASO · PI KIRKEN, ROBERT A. · 2012 to 2018
$19.4M
UTEP SCORE InstrumentationS06GM008012 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS EL PASO · PI GARZA, KRISTINE M · 1989 to 2010
$15.8M
NCRR NIH HHS G12 RR008124NIGMS NIH HHS S06 GM008012NIMHD NIH HHS G12 MD007592
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As large quantities of novel synthetic molecules continue to be generated there is a challenge to identify therapeutic agents with cytotoxic activity. Here we introduce a Differential Nuclear Staining (DNS) assay adapted to live-cell imaging for high throughput screening (HTS) that utilizes two fluorescent DNA intercalators, Hoechst 33342 and Propidium iodide (PI). Since Hoechst can readily cross cell membranes to stain DNA of living and dead cells, it was used to label the total number of cells. In contrast, PI only enters cells with compromised plasma membranes, thus selectively labeling dead cells. The DNS assay was successfully validated by utilizing well known cytotoxic agents with fast or slow cytotoxic activities. The assay was found to be suitable for HTS with Z' factors ranging from 0.86 to 0.60 for 96 and 384-well formats, respectively. Furthermore, besides plate-to-plate reproducibility, assay quality performance was evaluated by determining ratios of signal-to-noise and signal-to-background, as well as coefficient of variation, which resulted in adequate values and validated the assay for HTS initiatives. As proof of concept, eighty structurally diverse compounds from a small molecule library were screened in a 96-well plate format using the DNS assay. Using this DNS assay, six hits with cytotoxic properties were identified and all of them were also successfully identified by using the commercially available MTS assay (CellTiter 96® Cell Proliferation Assay). In addition, the DNS and a flow cytometry assay were used to validate the activity of the cytotoxic compounds. The DNS assay was also used to generate dose-response curves and to obtain CC

Indexed as

Drug discoveryHigh-content screeningHit identificationImage-based assayLive-cell fluorescence assayPropidium iodide

Identifiers

PMID27042697
PMCPMC4816492
OpenAlexW2468689285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.