Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27042483›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR2016

State of Science, "Intuition in Nursing Practice": A Systematic Review Study.

Parkhide Hassani, Alireza Abdi, Rostam Jalali

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Parkhide HassaniAssistance Professor, Department of Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences , Tehran, Iran .
Alireza AbdiPhd Student, Department of Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences , Tehran, Iran .
Rostam JalaliAssistance Professor, Department of Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences , Kermanshah, Iran .

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere were many attempts for introducing "intuition" to nursing practice, But despite the efficacy, it has been ignored as a valid way of knowing. Therefore the current study was conducted for evaluating the state of sciences to intuition in nursing practice. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn a systematic review study, all researches, published from 1995 to 2014, were searched in the databases of "PubMed", using "intuition" and "nursing" keywords. The abstract of articles were read in scrutiny, then the related researches selected, thereafter the full text of them was assessed carefully.

resultsFrom searching the databases, 144 articles with "intuition and nursing" were found, 53 as original research, and 15 with inclusion criteria were selected. Most of the studies had qualitative approaches design as phenomenology (N=4), content analyses (N=2) and grounded theory (N=1), six was done for developing the instrument, and two studies have been conducted as descriptive method.

conclusionThe results revealed the researches about intuition in nursing mostly were conducted with qualitative and instrument developing methodology and there is a lack of quantitative and trial studies.

Indexed as

Clinical decision-makingIntuitive judgmentsRational

Identifiers

PMID27042483
PMCPMC4800548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.