Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27042402›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied research in memory and cognition2016

How Fuzzy-Trace Theory Predicts True and False Memories for Words, Sentences, and Narratives.

Valerie F Reyna, Jonathan C Corbin, Rebecca B Weldon, Charles J Brainerd

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied research in memory and cognition, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Gender-sensitive considerations of prehospital teamwork in critical situations.Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Memory Sins in Applied Settings: What Kind of Progress?Journal of applied research in memory and cognition · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Valerie F ReynaCornell University.
Jonathan C CorbinCornell University.
Rebecca B WeldonCornell University.
Charles J BrainerdCornell University.

Funding

The Gist of Hot and Cold Cognition in Adolescents Risky Decision MakingR01NR014368 · NINR · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI REYNA, VALERIE FRANCES · 2012 to 2014
$1.8M
NINR NIH HHS R01 NR014368
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fuzzy-trace theory posits independent verbatim and gist memory processes, a distinction that has implications for such applied topics as eyewitness testimony. This distinction between precise, literal verbatim memory and meaning-based, intuitive gist accounts for memory paradoxes including dissociations between true and false memory, false memories outlasting true memories, and developmental increases in false memory. We provide an overview of fuzzy-trace theory, and, using mathematical modeling, also present results demonstrating verbatim and gist memory in true and false recognition of narrative sentences and inferences. Results supported fuzzy-trace theory's dual-process view of memory: verbatim memory was relied on to reject meaning-consistent, but unpresented, sentences (via recollection rejection). However, verbatim memory was often not retrieved, and gist memory supported acceptance of these sentences (via similarity judgment and phantom recollection). Thus, mathematical models of words can be extended to explain memory for complex stimuli, such as narratives, the kind of memory interrogated in law.

Indexed as

developmentfalse memoryfuzzy-trace theorygistnarrative memory

Identifiers

PMID27042402
PMCPMC4815269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.