ArticleThoracic cancer2016
Irinotecan plus fluorouracil-based regimen as second or third-line chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Article in Thoracic cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- A Phase II Study of Apatinib in Patients with Chemotherapy-Refractory Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ESO-Shanghai 11).The oncologist · 2021Trial
- Irinotecan plus S-1 versus S-1 in patients with previously treated recurrent or metastatic esophageal cancer (ESWN 01): a prospective randomized, multicenter, open-labeled phase 3 trial.Cancer communications (London, England) · 2019Trial
- Apatinib Combined with Irinotecan in the Treatment of Advanced Small-Cell Esophageal Carcinoma: A Case Report.OncoTargets and therapy · 2021Article
- Primary Squamous Cell Carcinoma, a Rare Pathological Report of Pancreatic Cancer.Caspian journal of internal medicine · 2021Article
- Mechanisms of Pharmaceutical Therapy and Drug Resistance in Esophageal Cancer.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Review
- Clinical efficacy of irinotecan plus raltitrexed chemotherapy in refractory esophageal squamous cell cancer.Anti-cancer drugs · 2020Article
- Efficacy of irinotecan-based chemotherapy after exposure to an anti-PD-1 antibody in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2019Article
- Lactate dehydrogenase and baseline markers associated with clinical outcomes of advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients treated with camrelizumab (SHR-1210), a novel anti-PD-1 antibody.Thoracic cancer · 2019Article
- Prognostic value of inflammation-based markers in advanced or metastatic neuroendocrine tumours.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNo standard second-line regimen exists for the treatment of advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of irinotecan and fluorouracil-based chemotherapy as a second or third-line regimen for advanced ESCC patients.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed a cohort of 27 consecutive patients with advanced ESCC in one institute, treated with a combination of irinotecan plus fluorouracil-based regimens after the failure of first-line platinum-based therapy. Nine patients were treated with 150-160 mg/m(2) irinotecan and 400 mg/m(2) fluorouracil (5-FU) on day 1, followed by 2000 mg/m(2) 5-FU during a 48-hour infusion every two weeks. Eighteen patients received 150-160 mg/m(2) irinotecan on day 1 and 80-120 mg/day S-1 on days 1-10 every two weeks. The S-1 dose was based on the patients' body surface area.
resultsTwenty-four of the 27 patients were assessable for response. One (3.7%) patient achieved complete response, seven (25.9%) achieved partial response, eight (29.6%) had stable disease, and eight (29.6%) had progressive disease. The median progression-free and overall survival were 4.8 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.2-8.4) and 10.5 months (95% CI: 8.4-12.7), respectively. Grade 3 neutropenia and diarrhea were detected in four (15%) and one (4%) patient, respectively. No grade 4 toxicity was noted.
conclusionsOur study indicates that an irinotecan plus 5-FU-based regimen is effective and well-tolerated as a second or third-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced ESCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.