Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27042165›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the ... annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking. International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking2015

CIDER: Enabling Robustness-Power Tradeoffs on a Computational Eyeglass.

Addison Mayberry, Yamin Tun, Pan Hu, Duncan Smith-Freedman, Deepak Ganesan, Benjamin Marlin, Christopher Salthouse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the ... annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking. International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. iLid: Low-power Sensing of Fatigue and Drowsiness Measures on a Computational Eyeglass.Proceedings of the ACM on interactive, mobile, wearable and ubiquitous technologies · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Addison MayberryUniversity of Massachusetts, Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003.
Yamin TunUniversity of Massachusetts, Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003.
Pan HuUniversity of Massachusetts, Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003.
Duncan Smith-FreedmanUniversity of Massachusetts, Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003.
Deepak GanesanUniversity of Massachusetts, Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003.
Benjamin MarlinUniversity of Massachusetts, Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003.
Christopher SalthouseUniversity of Massachusetts, Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003.

Funding

TRAINING U54EB020404 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS · PI KUMAR, SANTOSH · 2014 to 2018
$11.3M
NIBIB NIH HHS U54 EB020404
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human eye offers a fascinating window into an individual's health, cognitive attention, and decision making, but we lack the ability to continually measure these parameters in the natural environment. The challenges lie in: a) handling the complexity of continuous high-rate sensing from a camera and processing the image stream to estimate eye parameters, and b) dealing with the wide variability in illumination conditions in the natural environment. This paper explores the power-robustness tradeoffs inherent in the design of a wearable eye tracker, and proposes a novel staged architecture that enables graceful adaptation across the spectrum of real-world illumination. We propose CIDER, a system that operates in a highly optimized low-power mode under indoor settings by using a fast Search-Refine controller to track the eye, but detects when the environment switches to more challenging outdoor sunlight and switches models to operate robustly under this condition. Our design is holistic and tackles a) power consumption in digitizing pixels, estimating pupillary parameters, and illuminating the eye via near-infrared, b) error in estimating pupil center and pupil dilation, and c) model training procedures that involve zero effort from a user. We demonstrate that CIDER can estimate pupil center with error less than two pixels (0.6°), and pupil diameter with error of one pixel (0.22mm). Our end-to-end results show that we can operate at power levels of roughly 7mW at a 4Hz eye tracking rate, or roughly 32mW at rates upwards of 250Hz.

Indexed as

eye trackingnear-infraredneural networkpower robustness tradeoffpupilwearable

Identifiers

PMID27042165
PMCPMC4813664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.