ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2016
Treatment costs of cystoid macular edema among patients following cataract surgery.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- Liposomal drug delivery system for anti-inflammatory treatment after cataract surgery: a phase I/II clinical trial.Drug delivery and translational research · 2022Trial
- Efficacy and safety of fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant (0.2 µg/day) in patients with post-surgical inflammation associated with macular edema: a case series study.Journal of ophthalmic inflammation and infection · 2025Article
- Intraocular lens selection in diabetic patients: How to increase the odds for success.World journal of diabetes · 2024Review
- Real-world treatment patterns and economic burden of post-cataract macular edema.BMC ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Modified inexpensive needle for suprachoroidal triamcinolone acetonide injections in pseudophakic cystoid macular edema.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2021Article
- Autophagy and Aging: Roles in Skeletal Muscle, Eye, Brain and Hepatic Tissue.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Review
- Anti-inflammatory treatment after cataract surgery in Sweden: changes in prescribing patterns from 2010 to 2017.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2021Article
- Comparing Combination Drop Therapy to a Standard Drop Regimen After Routine Cataract Surgery.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2020Article
- Cataract in diabetes mellitus.World journal of diabetes · 2019Review
- Quantifying the real-world cost saving from using surgical adjuncts to prevent complications during cataract surgery.Eye (London, England) · 2018Article
- Topical nepafenac for prevention of post-cataract surgery macular edema in diabetic patients: patient selection and perspectives.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe current costs of treating cystoid macular edema (CME), a complication that can follow cataract surgery, are largely unknown. This analysis estimates the treatment costs for CME based on the recently released US Medicare data.
settingNationally representative database.
designRetrospective analysis of the 2011 through 2013 Medicare 5% Beneficiary Encrypted Files.
methodsBeneficiaries who underwent cataract surgery were identified and stratified by diagnosis of CME (cases) or no diagnosis of CME (controls) within 6 months following surgery. Claims and reimbursements for ophthalmic care were identified. Subgroup analyses explored the rates of CME in beneficiaries based on the presence of selected comorbidities and by the type of procedure (standard vs complex). Total Medicare and ophthalmic costs for cases and controls are presented. The analysis explored the effect of considering diabetic macular edema (DME) and macular edema (ME) as exclusion criteria.
resultsOf 78,949 beneficiaries with cataract surgery, 2.54% (n=2,003) were diagnosed with CME. One-third of beneficiaries had one or more conditions affecting retinal health (including diabetes), 4.5% of whom developed CME. The rate of CME, at 22.5%, was much higher for those patients with preoperative DME or ME. Ophthalmic charges were almost twice as high for cases compared with controls (US$10,410 vs $5,950); payments averaged 85% higher ($2,720 vs $1,470) (both P<0.0001).
conclusionSubstantial costs can be associated with CME; beneficiaries whose retinas are already compromised before cataract surgery face higher risk. Cost savings could be realized with the use of therapies that reduce the risk of developing CME. Future analyses could identify whether and to what extent comorbidities influence costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.