Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27041900›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical dentistry

In vivo comparison of cavity disinfection efficacy with APF gel, Propolis, Diode Laser, and 2% chlorhexidine in primary teeth.

P V M Uday Mohan, K S Uloopi, C Vinay, R Chandrasekhar Rao

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical dentistry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03186261 phase3completednot on this map

Evaluation of the Antibacterial Effect of Nano Silver Fluoride Versus Chlorhexidine on Occlusal Carious Molars Treated With Partial Caries Removal Technique: A Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorCairo UniversityRan2018 to 2018Enrolled44ConditionsDental CariesArmsNano silver fluoride solution, Cavity Cleanser
NCT03478150 naunknown statusnot on this map

Evaluation of The Antibacterial Effect of Laser Diode and Zinc Oxide Nano-particles on Streptococcus Mutans Bacteria Used as Cavity Disinfectants in Deep Carious Lesions : A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorCairo UniversityRan2018 to 2019Enrolled30ConditionsDental CariesArmszinc oxide nano-particles, laser diode
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Evaluating the effectiveness of various disinfectants in deep carious lesions: AnJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Propolis: A natural biomaterial for dental and oral healthcare.Journal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects · 2017
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Effect of low-level diode laser onJournal of oral biology and craniofacial research
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

P V M Uday MohanDepartment of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India.
K S UloopiDepartment of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India.
C VinayDepartment of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India.
R Chandrasekhar RaoDepartment of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India.
MNR Dental College and Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe survival of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) restorations would be enhanced if near total elimination of cariogenic microorganisms could be done in the process of cavity cleaning before placing a restoration. Thus, use of disinfecting agents for achieving this goal could herald a new beginning in the field of contemporary dentistry.

aimTo assess and compare the cavity disinfection efficacy of APF gel, Brazilian Propolis, Diode Laser, and 2% chlorhexidine (CHX). MATERIALS AND

methodsThe study was a randomized, single blinded, parallel grouped, active controlled trial. Eighty primary molars in 68 children with cavitated dentinal occlusal caries were randomly assigned into four groups (20 teeth each) Group I: APF gel; Group II: Propolis; Group III: Diode Laser, and Group IV: 2% CHX (control). After cavity preparation using ART procedure, dentinal samples collected before and after disinfection with respective agent of the group. These samples were subjected to microbiological evaluation, for total viable count (TVC) on blood agar, Streptococcus mutans on mutans-sanguis (MS) agar, and Lactobacilli (LB) on Rogosa agar.

resultsIntragroup comparison (Wilcoxon signed rank test) showed significant reductions in TVC, MS, and LB counts in all the groups. Pairwise Mann-Whitney test showed APF gel had least bacterial reductions among the agents tested.

conclusionThis study illustrated the need for cavity disinfection. Diode Laser and Brazilian Propolis are equally effective as 2% CHX in cavity disinfection.

Indexed as

APF gelatraumatic restorative treatmentcavity disinfectiondiode Laser and 2% chlorhexidinePropolis

Identifiers

PMID27041900
PMCPMC4792055
OpenAlexW2278007301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.