Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27041772›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics2016

A Two Sample Distribution-Free Test for Functional Data with Application to a Diffusion Tensor Imaging Study of Multiple Sclerosis.

Gina-Maria Pomann, Ana-Maria Staicu, Sujit Ghosh

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Testing homogeneity: the trouble with sparse functional data.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical methodology · 2023
    Article
  8. Robust Non-negative Tensor Factorization, Diffeomorphic Motion Correction, and Functional Statistics to Understand Fixation in Fluorescence Microscopy.Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gina-Maria PomannDuke University, Durham, USA.
Ana-Maria StaicuNorth Carolina State University, Raleigh, USA.
Sujit GhoshNorth Carolina State University, Raleigh and Statistical and Applied Mathematical Sciences Institute, RTP, NC. USA.
North Carolina State University · USDuke University · US

Funding

Statistical Analysis of Biomedical Imaging Data in Curved SpaceR01MH086633 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI IBRAHIM, JOSEPH G · 2010 to 2018
$2.9M
Statistical methods for large and complex databases of ultra-high-dimensionalR01NS085211 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI SHINOHARA, RUSSELL TAKESHI · 2013 to 2017
$1.8M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH086633NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS085211
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivated by an imaging study, this paper develops a nonparametric testing procedure for testing the null hypothesis that two samples of curves observed at discrete grids and with noise have the same underlying distribution. The objective is to formally compare white matter tract profiles between healthy individuals and multiple sclerosis patients, as assessed by conventional diffusion tensor imaging measures. We propose to decompose the curves using functional principal component analysis of a mixture process, which we refer to as

Identifiers

PMID27041772
PMCPMC4812165
OpenAlexW2228143617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.