Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27041408›Full record

ArticleClinical therapeutics2016

Qualitative Development and Content Validity of the Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Symptom Assessment Questionnaire (NSCLC-SAQ), A Patient-reported Outcome Instrument.

Kelly P McCarrier, Thomas M Atkinson, Kendra P A DeBusk, Astra M Liepa, Michael Scanlon, Stephen Joel Coons, Patient-Reported Outcome Consortium, Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Working Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical therapeutics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Current trends in patient and public involvement in cancer research: A systematic review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Meaningful change threshold estimation for the non-small cell lung cancer symptom assessment questionnaire (NSCLC-SAQ): psychometric analysis from a phase 3 trial (LIBRETTO-431).Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Trial
  3. Patient-reported outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer: psychometric evaluation of the PROMIS PF-SF 8c and NSCLC-SAQ in two phase 3 clinical trials.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. First-Line Selpercatinib or Chemotherapy and Pembrolizumab inThe New England journal of medicine · 2023
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Symptoms and impacts in anemia of chronic kidney disease.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kelly P McCarrierHealth Research Associates, Mountlake Terrace, Washington. Electronic address: mccarrier@hrainc.net.
Thomas M AtkinsonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Kendra P A DeBuskPatient-Centered Outcomes Research, Genentech, South San Francisco, California.
Astra M LiepaGlobal Patient Outcomes and Real World Evidence, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Michael ScanlonHealth Research Associates, Mountlake Terrace, Washington.
Stephen Joel CoonsCritical Path Institute, Patient-Reported Outcome Consortium, Tucson, Arizona.
Patient-Reported Outcome Consortium, Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Working Group

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Elisa de Stanchina · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Critical Path to Public Private PartnershipsU18FD005320 · FDA · CRITICAL PATH INSTITUTE · PI Klaus Romero · 2014 to 2026
$127.1M
Critical Path InstituteU01FD003865 · FDA · CRITICAL PATH INSTITUTE · PI BRUMFIELD, MARTHA A · 2009 to 2013
$9.8M
FDA HHS U01 FD003865FDA HHS U18 FD005320NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this article was to describe the process and results of the preliminary qualitative development of a new symptoms-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure intended for assessing treatment benefit in clinical trials of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

methodsIndividual qualitative interviews were conducted in adults with NSCLC (Stages I-IV) in the United States. Experienced interviewers conducted concept-elicitation (CE) and cognitive interviews using semistructured interview guides. The CE interview guide was used for eliciting spontaneous reports of symptom experiences along with probing to further explore and confirm concepts. Interview transcripts were coded and analyzed by professional qualitative coders, and were summarized by like content using an iterative coding framework. Data from the CE interviews were considered alongside existing literature and clinical expert opinion during an item-generation process, leading to the development of a preliminary version of the NSCLC Symptom Assessment Questionnaire (SAQ). Three waves of cognitive interviews were conducted to evaluate concept relevance, item interpretability, and structure of the draft items and to facilitate further instrument refinement.

findingsFifty-one subjects (mean [SD] age, 64.9 [11.2] years; 51.0% women) participated in the CE interviews. A total of 1897 expressions of NSCLC-related symptoms were identified and coded in interview transcripts, representing ~42 distinct symptom concepts. A 9-item initial-draft instrument was developed for testing in 3 waves of cognitive interviews with additional subjects with NSCLC (n = 20), during which both paper and electronic versions of the instrument were evaluated and refined. Participant responses and feedback during cognitive interviews led to the removal of 2 items and substantial modifications to others. IMPLICATIONS: The NSCLC-SAQ is a 7-item PRO measure intended for use in advanced NSCLC clinical trials to support medical product labelling. The NSCLC-SAQ uses a 7-day recall period and verbal rating scales. It was developed in accordance with the US Food and Drug Administration's PRO Guidance and scientific best practices, and the resulting qualitative interview data provide evidence of content validity. The NSCLC-SAQ has been prepared in both paper and electronic administration formats and a tablet computer-based version is currently undergoing quantitative testing to confirm its measurement properties and support US Food and Drug Administration qualification.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresSurveys and QuestionnairesAgedCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle Agedcontent validityNSCLCpatient-reported outcome (PRO)qualitative researchscale development

Identifiers

PMID27041408
PMCPMC4851890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.