ArticleClinical therapeutics2016
Qualitative Development and Content Validity of the Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Symptom Assessment Questionnaire (NSCLC-SAQ), A Patient-reported Outcome Instrument.
Article in Clinical therapeutics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Current trends in patient and public involvement in cancer research: A systematic review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2019Pooled it
- Meaningful change threshold estimation for the non-small cell lung cancer symptom assessment questionnaire (NSCLC-SAQ): psychometric analysis from a phase 3 trial (LIBRETTO-431).Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025Trial
- Patient-reported outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer: psychometric evaluation of the PROMIS PF-SF 8c and NSCLC-SAQ in two phase 3 clinical trials.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025Trial
- Developing a fit-for-purpose composite symptom score as a symptom burden endpoint for clinical trials in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma.Scientific reports · 2024Trial
- First-Line Selpercatinib or Chemotherapy and Pembrolizumab inThe New England journal of medicine · 2023Trial
- Patient-Reported Symptoms and Quality of Life With Sacituzumab Govitecan Versus Docetaxel in Metastatic NSCLC: The Phase 3, Randomized EVOKE-01 Trial.JTO clinical and research reports · 2026Article
- Assessment of patient-reported symptom and psychological distress after neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy and lung resection for non-small cell lung cancer.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Patient-Reported Outcomes From LIBRETTO-431: First-Line Selpercatinib Versus Chemotherapy With Pembrolizumab inJTO clinical and research reports · 2025Article
- REZILIENT3: randomized phase III study of first-line zipalertinib plus chemotherapy in patients withFuture oncology (London, England) · 2025Article
- From the Formation of Conceptual Framework to Regulatory Decision-Making: Considerations for the Developments of Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments.Drug design, development and therapy · 2024Review
- Development of a Conceptual Model of the Patient Experience in Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Qualitative Interview Study.Oncology and therapy · 2023Article
- Article
- Qualitative Analysis of the Content Validity of the Virtual Reality Functional Capacity Assessment Tool (VRFCAT) in Schizophrenia: A Multi-Stakeholder Perspective.Schizophrenia bulletin open · 2023Article
- Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Symptom Assessment Questionnaire (NSCLC-SAQ): Measurement Properties and Estimated Clinically Meaningful Thresholds From a Phase 3 Study.JTO clinical and research reports · 2022Article
- Evaluating the Content Validity, Clarity, and Relevance of Two Patient-Reported Outcomes for Use With Adults WithJTO clinical and research reports · 2021Article
- Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Symptom Assessment Questionnaire: Psychometric Performance and Regulatory Qualification of a Novel Patient-Reported Symptom Measure.Current therapeutic research, clinical and experimental · 2021Article
- Symptoms and impacts in anemia of chronic kidney disease.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2020Article
- The Cystic Fibrosis Impact Questionnaire: qualitative development and cognitive evaluation of a new patient-reported outcome instrument to assess the life impacts of cystic fibrosis.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2020Article
- Prospective development of a patient-reported outcomes instrument for desmoid tumors or aggressive fibromatosis.Cancer · 2020Article
- Feasibility and Utility of Incorporating Patient-Reported Outcomes into Surveillance Strategies for Advanced Lung Cancer.Patient related outcome measures · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this article was to describe the process and results of the preliminary qualitative development of a new symptoms-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure intended for assessing treatment benefit in clinical trials of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
methodsIndividual qualitative interviews were conducted in adults with NSCLC (Stages I-IV) in the United States. Experienced interviewers conducted concept-elicitation (CE) and cognitive interviews using semistructured interview guides. The CE interview guide was used for eliciting spontaneous reports of symptom experiences along with probing to further explore and confirm concepts. Interview transcripts were coded and analyzed by professional qualitative coders, and were summarized by like content using an iterative coding framework. Data from the CE interviews were considered alongside existing literature and clinical expert opinion during an item-generation process, leading to the development of a preliminary version of the NSCLC Symptom Assessment Questionnaire (SAQ). Three waves of cognitive interviews were conducted to evaluate concept relevance, item interpretability, and structure of the draft items and to facilitate further instrument refinement.
findingsFifty-one subjects (mean [SD] age, 64.9 [11.2] years; 51.0% women) participated in the CE interviews. A total of 1897 expressions of NSCLC-related symptoms were identified and coded in interview transcripts, representing ~42 distinct symptom concepts. A 9-item initial-draft instrument was developed for testing in 3 waves of cognitive interviews with additional subjects with NSCLC (n = 20), during which both paper and electronic versions of the instrument were evaluated and refined. Participant responses and feedback during cognitive interviews led to the removal of 2 items and substantial modifications to others. IMPLICATIONS: The NSCLC-SAQ is a 7-item PRO measure intended for use in advanced NSCLC clinical trials to support medical product labelling. The NSCLC-SAQ uses a 7-day recall period and verbal rating scales. It was developed in accordance with the US Food and Drug Administration's PRO Guidance and scientific best practices, and the resulting qualitative interview data provide evidence of content validity. The NSCLC-SAQ has been prepared in both paper and electronic administration formats and a tablet computer-based version is currently undergoing quantitative testing to confirm its measurement properties and support US Food and Drug Administration qualification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.