Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27041276›Full record

ArticlePediatric radiology2016

Safety of gadobutrol in more than 1,000 pediatric patients: subanalysis of the GARDIAN study, a global multicenter prospective non-interventional study.

Katja Glutig, Ravi Bhargava, Gabriele Hahn, Wolfgang Hirsch, Christian Kunze, Hans-Joachim Mentzel, Jürgen F Schaefer, Winfried Willinek, Petra Palkowitsch, GARDIAN study group

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric radiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Prospective Multicenter Study of the Safety of Gadoteridol in 6163 Patients.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2020
    Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Katja GlutigChildren's Center Dresden-Friedrichstadt, Fachärztin für Radiologie und Kinderradiologie, Überörtliche Radiologische Gemeinschaftspraxis Dresden-Loschwitz, Standort Kinderzentrum Dresden-Friedrichstadt, Friedrichstr. 32, 01067, Dresden, Germany. katja.glutig@kid-dresden.de.
Ravi BhargavaStollery Children's Hospital, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Gabriele HahnPediatric Radiology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Wolfgang HirschPediatric Radiology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Christian KunzePediatric Radiology, Martin-Luther-University Hospital Halle/Wittenberg, Halle, Germany.
Hans-Joachim MentzelPediatric Radiology, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany.
Jürgen F SchaeferDivision of Radiology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Winfried WillinekRadiology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Petra PalkowitschMedical & Clinical Affairs Radiology, Bayer Pharma, Berlin, Germany.
GARDIAN study group
Jena University Hospital · DEUniversity Hospital Bonn · DEUniversity Hospital Leipzig · DEUniversity of Alberta · CABayer (Germany) · DEKrankenhaus Dresden-Friedrichstadt · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGadobutrol is a gadolinium-based contrast agent, uniquely formulated at 1.0 mmol/ml. Although there is extensive safety evidence on the use of gadobutrol in adults, few studies have addressed the safety and tolerability of gadobutrol in pediatric patients.

objectiveThis subanalysis of data from the GARDIAN study evaluated the safety and use of gadobutrol in pediatric patients (age <18 years). MATERIALS AND

methodsThe GARDIAN study was a large phase IV non-interventional prospective multicenter post-authorization safety study performed in Europe, Asia, North America and Africa. A total of 23,708 patients were included who were scheduled to undergo cranial or spinal MRI, liver or kidney MRI, or MR angiography with gadobutrol enhancement. The primary study endpoint was the overall incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) following gadobutrol administration.

resultsThe GARDIAN study included 1,142 children (age <18 years) who received gadobutrol at a mean dose of 0.13 (range 0.04-0.50) mmol/kg body weight. Gadobutrol was well tolerated in these children, with low rates of ADRs (0.5%) and no SAEs, consistent with results in adults enrolled in the GARDIAN study. Rates of adverse events and ADRs were unrelated to pediatric age or gadobutrol weight-adjusted dose. There were no symptoms suggestive of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. Investigators rated the contrast quality of gadobutrol-enhanced images as good or excellent in 97.8% of pediatric patients, similar to the main study population.

conclusionGadobutrol is very well tolerated and provides excellent contrast quality at the recommended weight-adjusted dose in children (age <18 years), similar to the profile in adults.

Indexed as

AdolescentChildChild, PreschoolContrast MediaDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleHumansImage EnhancementInfantMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleOrganometallic CompoundsProspective StudiesContrast MediagadobutrolOrganometallic CompoundsChildrenGadobutrolGadolinium-based contrast agentMagnetic resonance angiographyMagnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID27041276
PMCPMC4943967
OpenAlexW2313736087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.