Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27040974›Full record

ArticleMedical microbiology and immunology2016

American tegumentary leishmaniasis: T-cell differentiation profile of cutaneous and mucosal forms-co-infection with Trypanosoma cruzi.

Cecilia Parodi, María F García Bustos, Alejandra Barrio, Federico Ramos, Ana G González Prieto, María C Mora, Patricia Baré, Miguel A Basombrío, María M de Elizalde de Bracco

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical microbiology and immunology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Tegumentary leishmaniasis and coinfections other than HIV.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2018
    Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Cecilia ParodiInstituto de Patología Experimental-CONICET, Universidad Nacional de Salta, Salta, Argentina. ceciliaparodi@conicet.gov.ar.
María F García BustosInstituto de Patología Experimental-CONICET, Universidad Nacional de Salta, Salta, Argentina.
Alejandra BarrioCátedra de Microbiología, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Nacional de Salta, Salta, Argentina.
Federico RamosInstituto de Patología Experimental-CONICET, Universidad Nacional de Salta, Salta, Argentina.
Ana G González PrietoCátedra de Microbiología, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Nacional de Salta, Salta, Argentina.
María C MoraInstituto de Patología Experimental-CONICET, Universidad Nacional de Salta, Salta, Argentina.
Patricia BaréLaboratorio de Inmunología, Instituto de Medicina Experimental-CONICET, Academia Nacional de Medicina, Pacheco de Melo 3081, CP1425, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Miguel A BasombríoInstituto de Patología Experimental-CONICET, Universidad Nacional de Salta, Salta, Argentina.
María M de Elizalde de BraccoLaboratorio de Inmunología, Instituto de Medicina Experimental-CONICET, Academia Nacional de Medicina, Pacheco de Melo 3081, CP1425, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

American tegumentary leishmaniasis displays two main clinical forms: cutaneous (CL) and mucosal (ML). ML is more resistant to treatment and displays a more severe and longer evolution. Since both forms are caused by the same Leishmania species, the immunological response of the host may be an important factor determining the evolution of the disease. Herein, we analyzed the differentiation and memory profile of peripheral CD4(+) and CD8(+) T lymphocytes of patients with CL and ML and their Leishmania-T. cruzi co-infected counterparts. We measured the expression of CD27, CD28, CD45RO, CD127, PD-1 and CD57, together with interferon-γ and perforin. A highly differentiated phenotype was reflected on both T subsets in ML and preferentially on CD8(+) T cells in CL. A positive trend toward a higher T differentiation profile was found in T. cruzi-infected CL and ML patients as compared with Leishmania single infections. Association between CD8(+) T-cell differentiation and illness duration was found within the first year of infection, with progressive increase of highly differentiated markers over time. Follow-up of patients with good response to therapy showed predominance of early differentiated CD8(+) T cells and decrease of highly differentiated cells, while patients with frequent relapses presented the opposite pattern. CD8(+) T cells showed the most striking changes in their phenotype during leishmaniasis. Patients with long-term infections showed the highest differentiated degree implying a relation between T differentiation and parasite persistence. Distinct patterns of CD8(+) T differentiation during follow-up of different clinical outcomes suggest the usefulness of this analysis in the characterization of Leishmania-infected patients.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntigens, CDCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCell DifferentiationChagas DiseaseChildCoinfectionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansImmunophenotypingInterferon-gammaAntigens, CDInterferon-gammaPerforinCutaneous leishmaniasisDifferentiation and memory phenotypeLeishmania–T. cruzi co-infectionMucosal leishmaniasisPeripheral T lymphocytes

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.