Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27040719›Full record

ArticleChild development2016

Longitudinal Associations Between the Quality of Mother-Infant Interactions and Brain Development Across Infancy.

Annie Bernier, Susan D Calkins, Martha Ann Bell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Child development, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Annie BernierUniversity of Montreal.
Susan D CalkinsUniversity of North Carolina at Greensboro.
Martha Ann BellVirginia Tech.

Funding

Psychobiology of Cognitive DevelopmentR01HD049878 · NICHD · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI BELL, MARTHA ANN · 2007 to 2017
$5.0M
Infant Temperament and Cognitive DevelopmentR03HD043057 · NICHD · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI BELL, MARTHA ANN · 2003 to 2004
$141k
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD049878NICHD NIH HHS R03 HD043057
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate if normative variations in parenting relate to brain development among typically developing children. A sample of 352 mother-infant dyads came to the laboratory when infants were 5, 10, and 24 months of age (final N = 215). At each visit, child resting electroencephalography (EEG) was recorded. Mother-infant interactions were videotaped at the 5-month visit. The results indicated that higher quality maternal behavior during mother-infant interactions predicted higher frontal resting EEG power at 10 and 24 months, as well as increases in power between 5 and 10 months, and between 10 and 24 months. These findings provide rare support for the hypothesis that normative variation in parenting quality may contribute to brain development among typically developing infants.

Indexed as

Mother-Child RelationsChild DevelopmentChild, PreschoolElectroencephalographyFemaleFrontal LobeHumansInfantMaleMaternal Behavior

Identifiers

PMID27040719
PMCPMC4939105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.