Trial reportTransfusion2016
Clearance of stored red blood cells is not increased compared with fresh red blood cells in a human endotoxemia model.
Trial report in Transfusion, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Post-Transfusion Hemophagocytosis Without Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2019Article
- Review
- Measuring Post-transfusion Recovery and Survival of Red Blood Cells: Strengths and Weaknesses of Chromium-51 Labeling and Alternative Methods.Frontiers in medicine · 2018Article
- Antibodies to biotinylated red blood cells in adults and infants: improved detection, partial characterization, and dependence on red blood cell-biotin dose.Transfusion · 2017Article
- Red blood cell storage time and transfusion: current practice, concerns and future perspectives.Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue · 2017Review
- Effect of "old" versus "fresh" transfused red blood cells on patients' outcome: probably more complex than appears.Journal of thoracic disease · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIt is thought that the clearance of transfused red blood cells (RBCs) is related both to the storage time of the transfusion product and to the inflammatory status of the recipient. We investigated these effects in a randomized, "two-hit," healthy volunteer transfusion model, comparing autologous RBCs that were stored for 35 days with those that were stored for 2 days. STUDY DESIGN AND
methodsHealthy male volunteers donated 1 unit of autologous RBCs either 2 days (2D) or 35 days (35D) before the study date. The experiment was started by infusion of 2 ng/kg lipopolysaccharide ("first hit"). Two hours later, the stored RBCs ("second hit") were reinfused, followed by the labeling of RBCs with biotin. Clearance of biotin-labeled RBCs (BioRBCs) was measured during the 5-hour posttransfusion endotoxemia period along with measurements of phosphatidylserine (PS) exposure, lactadherin binding, and expression of CD47 (cluster of differentiation 47; a transmembrane protein encoded by the CD47 gene).
resultsIn the 2D stored RBCs group, 1.5% ± 3.4% of infused BioRBCs were cleared from the circulation 5 hours posttransfusion versus 4.8% ± 4.0% in the 35D stored RBCs group (p = 0.1). There were no differences in PS exposure, lactadherin binding, or CD47 expression between fresh and stored RBCs or between pretransfusion and posttransfusion measurements.
conclusionOur study shows a low clearance of RBCs even during endotoxemia. Furthermore, short-term clearance of BioRBCs during endotoxemia was not related to storage duration. Consistent with these observations, PS exposure, lactadherin binding, and CD47 expression did not differ between 2D and 35D stored cells before or after transfusion. We conclude that, in the presence of endotoxemia, clearance of 35D stored autologous RBCs is not increased compared with 2D stored fresh RBCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.