Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27040401›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in cardiovascular medicine2016

Hippo/Yap Signaling in Cardiac Development and Regeneration.

Yang Xiao, John Leach, Jun Wang, James F Martin

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Unlocking cardiomyocyte renewal potential for myocardial regeneration therapy.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology · 2023
    Review
  9. Cardiomyocyte-fibroblast crosstalk in the postnatal heart.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Role of carotenoids and retinoids during heart development.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Molecular and cell biology of lipids · 2020
    Review
  17. Molecular mechanisms of heart regeneration.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yang XiaoDepartment of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
John LeachDepartment of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Jun WangDepartment of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
James F MartinDepartment of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. jfmartin@bcm.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementThe heart has historically been considered to be a non-regenerative organ. Recent insights have suggested that cardiomyocytes have a small but measurable ability to regenerate. Moreover, recent work has also shown that manipulating the expression of specific genetic pathways can improve the ability of the heart to repair itself. These new insights set the stage for the development of new treatments for heart failure.

Indexed as

Cardiac developmentCardiac regenerationHippo/Yap signaling

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.