Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27040370›Full record

ArticleNature communications2016

A facile route to old and new cyclophanes via self-assembly and capture.

Mary S Collins, Matthew E Carnes, Bryan P Nell, Lev N Zakharov, Darren W Johnson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Transformation of Imine Cages into Hydrocarbon Cages.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mary S CollinsDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry and the Materials Science Institute, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403-1253, USA.
Matthew E CarnesDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry and the Materials Science Institute, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403-1253, USA.
Bryan P NellDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry and the Materials Science Institute, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403-1253, USA.
Lev N ZakharovCenter for Advanced Materials Characterization in Oregon (CAMCOR), 1241 University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403-1241, USA.
Darren W JohnsonDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry and the Materials Science Institute, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403-1253, USA.
University of Oregon · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cyclophanes are a venerable class of macrocyclic and/or cage compounds that often feature high strain, unusual conformations and quite surprising properties, many of which are legendary in physical organic chemistry. However, the discovery of new, diverse cyclophanes and derivatives has been hindered by syntheses that are traditionally low-yielding, requiring long reaction times, laborious purification steps and often extreme conditions. Herein, we demonstrate a new self-assembly route to a variety of discrete cyclic and caged disulfide structures, which can then be kinetically captured upon sulfur extrusion at room temperature to give a diversity of new thioether (hetera)cyclophanes in high yield. In addition to the synthesis of novel macrocycles (dimers through hexamers), this process provides an improved route to a known macrobicyclic trithiacyclophane. This technique also enables the facile isolation of a tetrahedral macrotricyclic tetrathiacyclophane in two steps at an ambient temperature.

Identifiers

PMID27040370
PMCPMC4821999
OpenAlexW2339966390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.