ReviewUpdates in surgery2016
Current status of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in the emergency setting.
Review in Updates in surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feasibility of the caudal tunneling with lateral colonic attachment preservation procedure in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for ileocecal tuberculosis: a prospective cohort study.Annals of coloproctology · 2026Article
- Propensity score matching analysis of acute care (ACS) versus colorectal surgeons (CRS) in the management of left colonic perforation: Patient and system-level insights from a multicenter study.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026Article
- Comparison of Polymer Clips Versus Endoloop Ligatures for Appendiceal Stump Closure in Laparoscopic Appendectomy.Cureus · 2025Article
- Minimally invasive approach to peritonitis from left colonic perforation: a retrospective multicenter observational study.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Observational
- Article
- Current status of laparoscopic emergency surgery in Korea: multicenter restrospective cohort study.Journal of minimally invasive surgery · 2023Article
- Surgical Dilemmas Associated with Malignant Large Bowel Obstructions.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2022Review
- Laparoscopic Surgery for Acute Diffuse Peritonitis Due to Gastrointestinal Perforation: A Nationwide Epidemiologic Study Using the National Clinical Database.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2022Article
- Laparoscopy improves failure to rescue compared to open surgery for emergent colectomy.Updates in surgery · 2020Article
- Emergency treatment of complicated colorectal cancer.Cancer management and research · 2018Article
- Laparoscopic appendectomy: Hem-o-lok versus Endoloop in stump closure.Updates in surgery · 2017Article
- A simple and safe technique to decompress a large bowel obstruction.Updates in surgery · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Laparoscopic surgery has become well established in the management of both benign as malignant colorectal disease. However there has not been the same enthusiasm for the use of laparoscopy in emergency colorectal surgery. We have critically review the indications and the results of the laparoscopic approach for the treatment of acute colorectal disease. A systemic review based on comprehensive Literature research was made on Pubmed with the primary objective to identify all clinical relevant randomized controlled trials (RCT). However, other reports, population based outcomes studies, case series and case reports were also included. Cross-link control was than performed with Google Scholar and Cochrane library databases. We have reviewed the last years' evident literature about this last topic and the results reported , although mainly early, controversial and focused on the short term, enabled us to generally conclude that in a proper setting, laparoscopic colorectal emergency surgery is feasible, effective, safe and beneficial for patients to be a part of a common surgical practice, as long as adequate training is obtained and proper preparation observed when more advanced procedures are attempted in critically patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27040274What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.