Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27040273›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2016

"Scarless" and no-stoma surgery for low rectal cancer: the laparoscopic pull-through delayed "high" colo-anal anastomosis.

Francesco Bianco, Andrea Belli, Silvia De Franciscis, Armando Falato, Giovanni Maria Romano

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Francesco BiancoDivision of SurgicalOncology, Department of AbdominalOncology, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione G. Pascale"-IRCCS, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Andrea BelliDivision of SurgicalOncology, Department of AbdominalOncology, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione G. Pascale"-IRCCS, 80131, Naples, Italy. a.belli@istitutotumori.na.it.
Silvia De FranciscisDivision of SurgicalOncology, Department of AbdominalOncology, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione G. Pascale"-IRCCS, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Armando FalatoDivision of SurgicalOncology, Department of AbdominalOncology, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione G. Pascale"-IRCCS, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Giovanni Maria RomanoDivision of SurgicalOncology, Department of AbdominalOncology, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione G. Pascale"-IRCCS, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite recent improvements in surgical technique, low rectal anastomoses for rectal cancer still carry a not negligible incidence of anastomotic leakage and pelvic related morbidity. The Turnball-Cutait delayed colo-anal anastomosis, also referred as pull-through procedure was introduced with the aim to reduce the surgical anastomotic related complications and overcome the need of diverting ileostomy creation. Recently, this technique regained popularity as a viable option not only as salvage procedure after anastomotic failure or in case of hostile pelvis but also as first choice option in case of low rectal cancer. We report our experience with a personal technique for delayed "high" colo-anal anastomosis and its combination with a minimally invasive approach in order to reduce surgical morbidity, avoid the need for stoma creation and minimize the impact of surgery. Between 2011 and 2015, eight consecutive patients were operated for low rectal cancer by the described technique by a minimally invasive approach. The procedure was successfully completed in all cases. Post-operative major morbidity and 60 days mortality were nihil. There was no need for stoma creation or service laparotomy resulting in a virtually "scarless" surgery. Mean cumulative hospital stay (combining the two stages of the procedure) was 7, 6 days (range 7-9). The proposed technique by combining the advantage of a minimally invasive approach to those of a delayed "high" colo-anal anastomoses can be considered a viable option for the surgical treatment of low rectal cancer.

Indexed as

Suture TechniquesAgedAnal CanalAnastomosis, SurgicalColonFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedRectal NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeColoanalIleostomyLaparoscopyPull-throughRectal cancerTurnball-Cutait

Identifiers

PMID27040273
OpenAlexW2465911364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.