ArticleUpdates in surgery2016
"Scarless" and no-stoma surgery for low rectal cancer: the laparoscopic pull-through delayed "high" colo-anal anastomosis.
Article in Updates in surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Surgical outcomes of Turnbull-Cutait delayed coloanal anastomosis with pull-through versus immediate coloanal anastomosis with diverting stoma after total mesorectal excision for low rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Techniques in coloproctology · 2022Pooled it
- Delayed Colo-anal Anastomosis for Rectal Cancer: Pelvic Morbidity, Functional Results and Oncological Outcomes: A Systematic Review.World journal of surgery · 2019Pooled it
- Two-stage Turnbull-Cutait pull-through coloanal anastomosis versus coloanal anastomosis with protective loop ileostomy for low rectal cancer. Protocol for a randomized controlled trial (Turnbull-BCN).International journal of colorectal disease · 2017Trial
- Modified delayed coloanal anastomosis following TME for mid and low rectal cancer: 19 consecutive patients from a single center.Updates in surgery · 2024Article
- Risk factors for ischemia/necrosis of the colonic stump after proctectomy and delayed coloanal anastomosis.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2023Article
- Short stump and high anastomosis pull-through (SHiP) procedure for delayed coloanal anastomosis with no protective stoma for low rectal cancer.Updates in surgery · 2021Article
- Turnbull-Cutait technique without ileostomy after total mesorectal excision is associated with acceptably low early post-operative morbidity.ANZ journal of surgery · 2021Article
- Hostile pelvis: how to avoid permanent stoma.Updates in surgery · 2018Article
- Laparoscopic delayed coloanal anastomosis without diverting ileostomy for low rectal cancer surgery: 85 consecutive patients from a single institution.Techniques in coloproctology · 2018Article
- Ultimate Stomaless Technique of Two-Stage Operation for Lower Rectal Cancer Performed on a Patient with a High Body Mass Index: The Reborn Operation (Novel Pull-Through Method).Case reports in gastroenterologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite recent improvements in surgical technique, low rectal anastomoses for rectal cancer still carry a not negligible incidence of anastomotic leakage and pelvic related morbidity. The Turnball-Cutait delayed colo-anal anastomosis, also referred as pull-through procedure was introduced with the aim to reduce the surgical anastomotic related complications and overcome the need of diverting ileostomy creation. Recently, this technique regained popularity as a viable option not only as salvage procedure after anastomotic failure or in case of hostile pelvis but also as first choice option in case of low rectal cancer. We report our experience with a personal technique for delayed "high" colo-anal anastomosis and its combination with a minimally invasive approach in order to reduce surgical morbidity, avoid the need for stoma creation and minimize the impact of surgery. Between 2011 and 2015, eight consecutive patients were operated for low rectal cancer by the described technique by a minimally invasive approach. The procedure was successfully completed in all cases. Post-operative major morbidity and 60 days mortality were nihil. There was no need for stoma creation or service laparotomy resulting in a virtually "scarless" surgery. Mean cumulative hospital stay (combining the two stages of the procedure) was 7, 6 days (range 7-9). The proposed technique by combining the advantage of a minimally invasive approach to those of a delayed "high" colo-anal anastomoses can be considered a viable option for the surgical treatment of low rectal cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.