ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2016
A methodological pipeline for serial-section imaging and tissue realignment for whole-brain functional and connectivity assessment.
Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Hidden Brain: Uncovering Previously Overlooked Brain Regions by Employing Novel Preclinical Unbiased Network Approaches.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2021Review
- The retrosplenial-parietal network and reference frame coordination for spatial navigation.Behavioral neuroscience · 2018Review
- Article
- Age-related Changes in Lateral Entorhinal and CA3 Neuron Allocation Predict Poor Performance on Object Discrimination.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUnderstanding the neurobiological basis of cognition and behavior, and disruptions to these processes following injury and disease, requires a large-scale assessment of neural populations, and knowledge of their patterns of connectivity. NEW
methodWe present an analysis platform for large-scale investigation of functional and neuroanatomical connectivity in rodents. Retrograde tracers were injected and in a subset of animals behavioral tests to drive immediate-early gene expression were administered. This approach allows users to perform whole-brain assessment of function and connection in a semi-automated quantitative manner. Brains were cut in the coronal plane, and an image of the block face was acquired. Wide-field fluorescent scans of whole sections were acquired and analyzed using Matlab software.
resultsThe toolkit utilized open-source and custom platforms to accommodate a largely automated analysis pipeline in which neuronal boundaries are automatically segmented, the position of segmented neurons are co-registered with a corresponding image acquired during sectioning, and a 3-D representation of neural tracer (and other products) throughout the entire brain is generated. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING
methodsCurrent whole brain connectivity measures primarily target mice and use anterograde tracers. Our focus on segmented units of interest (e.g., NeuN labeled neurons) and restricting measures to these units produces a flexible platform for a variety of whole brain analyses (measuring activation, connectivity, markers of disease, etc.).
conclusionsThis open-source toolkit allows an investigator to visualize and quantify whole brain data in 3-D, and additionally provides a framework that can be rapidly integrated with user-specific analyses and methodologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.