Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27039386›Full record

Trial reportInvestigational new drugs2016

A phase I, dose escalation, pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic, and food-effect study of α2 integrin inhibitor E7820 in patients with advanced solid tumors.

B Milojkovic Kerklaan, S Slater, M Flynn, A Greystoke, P O Witteveen, M Megui-Roelvink, F de Vos, E Dean, L Reyderman, L Ottesen and 6 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IComparative StudyMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Investigational new drugs, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. RNA Regulators in Leukemia and Lymphoma.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2020
    Review
  17. The force awakens: metastatic dormant cancer cells.Experimental & molecular medicine · 2020
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 11 institutions in 3 countries.

B Milojkovic KerklaanDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Division of Internal Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
S SlaterThe Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, University Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
M FlynnUniversity College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
A GreystokeThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust / University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
P O WitteveenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
M Megui-RoelvinkDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Division of Internal Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
F de VosDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
E DeanThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust / University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
L ReydermanEisai Inc, Woodcliff Lake, NJ, USA.
L OttesenEisai Ltd, Hatfield, UK.
M RansonThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust / University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
M P J LolkemaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
R PlummerSir Bobby Robson Cancer Trials Research Centre Newcastle, Newcastle, UK.
R KristeleitUniversity College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
T R J EvansThe Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, University Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
J H M SchellensDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Division of Internal Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. j.schellens@nki.nl.
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLBeatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre · GBThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust · GBThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLEisai (United Kingdom) · GBEisai (United States) · USSir Bobby Robson Foundation · GBUniversity College Hospital · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Manchester · GBUtrecht University · NL

Funding

Cancer Research UK 11650Cancer Research UK 12946Cancer Research UK 20409Chief Scientist OfficeDepartment of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledIntroduction E7820 is an orally administered sulfonamide that inhibits alfa-2-integrin mRNA expression. Pre-clinically E7820 showed tumor anti-angiogenic effects in various tumor cell lines and xenograft mouse models. Human daily dosing of 100 mg QD had previously been shown to be safe and tolerable. Methods The study consisted of two parts: Part A (food effect) and Part B (determination of maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for bi-daily (BID) dosing). E7820 dosing started at 50 mg BID with planned escalation to 60, 80 and 100 mg BID every 28 days. Results Fifteen patients were enrolled in Part A and 26 in Part B. The most frequent adverse events of all grades were constipation, diarrhea, nausea, and fatigue while anemia, neutropenia, and fatigue were most frequent grade ≥3 toxicities. At dose-level 60 mg BID, two patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities (grade 3 neutropenic sepsis and grade 4 neutropenia). Therefore the recommended dose (RD) was 50 mg BID. Food had no effect on E7820 exposure. E7820 exposure following twice daily administration was dose-proportional. Expression of platelet integrin-α2 measured as a response biomarker in Part B, generally decreased by a median 7.7 % from baseline following treatment with 50 mg BID E7820. Reduction was most pronounced within 1-week post treatment. The median duration of treatment was median 54, range 20-111 days. The best overall response in any treatment group was stable disease (SD): 23.1 % in Part A (100 mg QD); at the RD 66.7 % (12 of 18 patients) and 40 % in the 60 mg BID group in Part B.

conclusionsFood had no effect on E7820 exposure. A dose of 50 mg BID was considered the MTD. Treatment with E7820 is safe and tolerable with 2/3 of patients (66.7 %) at MTD having SD as their best response.

Indexed as

Food-Drug InteractionsAdministration, OralAdultAgedAngiogenesis InhibitorsCross-Over StudiesDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansIndolesIntegrin alpha2MaleMaximum Tolerated DoseMiddle AgedNeoplasmsAngiogenesis InhibitorsIndolesIntegrin alpha2N-(3-cyano-4-methyl-1H-indol-7-yl)-3-cyanobenzene-sulfonamideRNA, MessengerSulfonamidesAromatic sulfonamideE7820Food effectIntegrin-α2Maximum tolerated dosePharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID27039386
OpenAlexW2321758906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.