Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27039345›Full record

ReviewNeuroscience and biobehavioral reviews2017

Why estrogens matter for behavior and brain health.

Liisa A M Galea, Karyn M Frick, Elizabeth Hampson, Farida Sohrabji, Elena Choleris

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 90 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
90citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

90 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Liisa A M GaleaDepartment of Psychology, Centre for Brain Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T1Z4, Canada. Electronic address: liisa.galea@ubc.ca.
Karyn M FrickDepartment of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI 53211, United States.
Elizabeth HampsonDepartment of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, London, ON N6A 5C2, Canada.
Farida SohrabjiDepartment of Neuroscience and Experimental Therapeutics, Texas A&M HSC College of Medicine, Bryan, TX 77807, United States.
Elena CholerisDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience Program, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.

Funding

Epigenetics of the Aging Astrocyte: Implications for StrokeR01AG042189 · NIA · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCE CTR · PI Farida Sohrabji · 2011 to 2026
$3.1M
Epigenetics of the Aging Astrocyte: Implications for StrokeRF1AG042189 · NIA · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY · PI SOHRABJI, FARIDA · 2018 to 2018
$2.8M
Neural mechanisms underlying estradiol-enhanced extinction of cocaine seekingR01DA038042 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE · PI MUELLER, DEVIN · 2014 to 2018
$1.7M
Neuroprotection in the Aging Female BrainR01NS074895 · NINDS · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCE CTR · PI SOHRABJI, FARIDA · 2011 to 2015
$1.7M
Hormone and enrichment effects on memory in aging miceR01AG022525 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI FRICK, KARYN M · 2005 to 2009
$1.3M
Neuroprotection in the aging female brainR56NS074895 · NINDS · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCE CTR · PI SOHRABJI, FARIDA · 2017 to 2017
$520k
Estrogenic-cholinergic interactions in memory modulationR03MH065460 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI FRICK, KARYN M · 2003 to 2004
$156k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG022525NIA NIH HHS R01 AG042189NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG042189NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA038042NIMH NIH HHS R03 MH065460NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS074895NINDS NIH HHS R56 NS074895
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) has required the inclusion of women in clinical studies since 1993, which has enhanced our understanding of how biological sex affects certain medical conditions and allowed the development of sex-specific treatment protocols. However, NIH's policy did not previously apply to basic research, and the NIH recently introduced a new policy requiring all new grant applications to explicitly address sex as a biological variable. The policy itself is grounded in the results of numerous investigations in animals and humans illustrating the existence of sex differences in the brain and behavior, and the importance of sex hormones, particularly estrogens, in regulating physiology and behavior. Here, we review findings from our laboratories, and others, demonstrating how estrogens influence brain and behavior in adult females. Research from subjects throughout the adult lifespan on topics ranging from social behavior, learning and memory, to disease risk will be discussed to frame an understanding of why estrogens matter to behavioral neuroscience.

Indexed as

BrainAnimalsBehaviorEstrogensFemaleHumansLearningMaleMemorySex CharacteristicsEstrogens

Identifiers

PMID27039345
PMCPMC5045786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.