Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27039305›Full record

SynthesisQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2016

Evaluation of measurement properties of self-administered PROMs aimed at patients with non-specific shoulder pain and "activity limitations": a systematic review.

M Thoomes-de Graaf, G G M Scholten-Peeters, J M Schellingerhout, A M Bourne, R Buchbinder, M Koehorst, C B Terwee, A P Verhagen

Open access · hybridAbstract readEvaluation StudySystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Proximal humerus fractures in the elderly: is there (still) a role for plate osteosynthesis?European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Translation, cross-cultural and construct validity of the Dutch-Flemish PROMIS® upper extremity item bank v2.0.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Psychometric properties of patient-reported outcome questionnaires for patients with musculoskeletal disorders of the shoulder.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. A new scale for measuring quality of life in acquired brain injury.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2019
    Article
  19. An evaluation of the structural validity of the shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI) using the Rasch model.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2018
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

M Thoomes-de GraafResearch Group Diagnostics, Avans University of Applied Science, Hogeschoollaan 1, 4818 CR, Breda, The Netherlands. marloesthoomes@me.com.
G G M Scholten-PeetersResearch Group Diagnostics, Avans University of Applied Science, Hogeschoollaan 1, 4818 CR, Breda, The Netherlands.
J M SchellingerhoutHet Huisartsenteam De Keen, Voorsteven 88, 4871 DX, Etten-Leur, The Netherlands.
A M BourneDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, The Alfred Centre, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 99 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.
R BuchbinderMonash Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Cabrini Institute, Suite 41, 183 Wattletree Rd, Malvern, Melbourne, VIC, 3144, Australia.
M KoehorstSOMT Institute for Master Education in Musculoskeletal Therapies, Softwareweg 5, 3821 BN, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.
C B TerweeDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics and the EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
A P VerhagenResearch Group Diagnostics, Avans University of Applied Science, Hogeschoollaan 1, 4818 CR, Breda, The Netherlands.
Avans University of Applied Sciences · NLThe Alfred Hospital · AUEMGO Institute for Health and Care Research · NLHuisarts en Wetenschap · NLSOMT University of Physiotherapy · NLVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo critically appraise and compare the measurement properties of self-administered patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) focussing on the shoulder, assessing "activity limitations." STUDY

designSystematic review. The study population had to consist of patients with shoulder pain. We excluded postoperative patients or patients with generic diseases. The methodological quality of the selected studies and the results of the measurement properties were critically appraised and rated using the COSMIN checklist.

resultsOut of a total of 3427 unique hits, 31 articles, evaluating 7 different questionnaires, were included. The SPADI is the most frequently evaluated PROM and its measurement properties seem adequate apart from a lack of information regarding its measurement error and content validity.

conclusionFor English, Norwegian and Turkish users, we recommend to use the SPADI. Dutch users could use either the SDQ or the SST. In German, we recommend the DASH. In Tamil, Slovene, Spanish and the Danish languages, the evaluated PROMs were not yet of acceptable validity. None of these PROMs showed strong positive evidence for all measurement properties. We propose to develop a new shoulder PROM focused on activity limitations, taking new knowledge and techniques into account.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingPain MeasurementPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresAdultChecklistFemaleHumansLanguageMaleMEDLINEMiddle AgedQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsShoulderShoulder PainSurveys and QuestionnairesDisabilityPatient outcome assessmentPsychometricsQuestionnaireShoulder painSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID27039305
PMCPMC4980404
OpenAlexW2315705324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.