Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27039282›Full record

ReviewPhysiology & behavior2016

Trends in the consumption of low-calorie sweeteners.

Allison C Sylvetsky, Kristina I Rother

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Physiology & behavior, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 130 papers, 14 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
130citing papers in PubMed, 14 pooled it
17.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

130 citing papers in PubMed, 14 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 314 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Guideline
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

70 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Allison C SylvetskyDepartment of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, United States; Section on Pediatric Diabetes and Metabolism, National Institutes of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, United States. Electronic address: asylvets@gwu.edu.
Kristina I RotherSection on Pediatric Diabetes and Metabolism, National Institutes of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, United States.
National Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Metabolic effects of non-nutritive sweetenersZIADK075093 · NIDDK · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES · PI ROTHER, KRISTINA · 2013 to 2019
$2.2M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA DK075093
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Low-calorie sweeteners (LCS) offer a palatable alternative to caloric sugars such as sucrose (table sugar) and high fructose corn syrup and are commonly found in soft drinks, sweetener packets, grains, snack foods, dairy products, hygiene products, and medications. Consumption of LCS has increased significantly in recent years and while this trend is expected to continue, controversy exists surrounding their use. The purpose of this article is to review trends in the consumption of LCS, to summarize differences in LCS consumption across socio-demographic subgroups and subtypes of LCS-containing products, and to highlight important challenges in the accurate assessment of LCS consumption.

Indexed as

Non-Nutritive SweetenersFeeding BehaviorHumansUnited StatesNon-Nutritive SweetenersArtificial or non-nutritive sweetenersConsumption trendsDiet sodaLow-calorie sweetenersSweetened beverages

Identifiers

PMID27039282
PMCPMC5578610
OpenAlexW2316084138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.