Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27039265›Full record

ReviewDevelopmental biology2017

Xenopus genomic data and browser resources.

Peter D Vize, Aaron M Zorn

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Developmental biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Methods for Tattooing Xenopus laevis with a Rotary Tattoo Machine.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Peter D VizeDepartments of Biological Science and Computer Science, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Electronic address: pvize@ucalgary.ca.
Aaron M ZornDivision of Developmental Biology, Cincinnati Children's Research Foundation, Cincinnati, OH, USA.

Funding

Xenbase: the Xenopus Model Organism KnowledgebaseP41HD064556 · NICHD · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI Aaron M Zorn · 2010 to 2026
$24.9M
Xenbase: a Xenopus Model Organism DatabaseR01HD045776 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY · PI VIZE, PETER D · 2005 to 2009
$1.9M
NICHD NIH HHS P41 HD064556NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD045776
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The two species of Xenopus most commonly used in biomedical research are the diploid Xenopus (Silurana) tropicalis and the tetraploid Xenopus laevis. The X. tropicalis genome sequence has been available since 2010 and this year the X. laevis, genome from two distinct genetic backgrounds has been published. Multiple genome assemblies available for both species and transcriptomic and epigenetic data sets are growing rapidly, all of which are available from a variety of web resources. This review describes the contents of these resources, how to locate and download genomic data, and also how to view and manipulate these data on various public genome browsers, with an emphasis on Xenbase, the Xenopus model organism database.

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticGenomeWeb BrowserAnimalsGene ExpressionGenomicsMicrocomputersTerminology as TopicXenopusXenopus laevis

Identifiers

PMID27039265
PMCPMC5045824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.