Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27039224›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of pediatrics2016

Comparison of Controlled Attenuation Parameter and Liver Biopsy to Assess Hepatic Steatosis in Pediatric Patients.

Nirav K Desai, Sarah Harney, Roshan Raza, Alyaa Al-Ibraheemi, Nick Shillingford, Paul D Mitchell, Maureen M Jonas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of pediatrics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nirav K DesaiDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA. Electronic address: Nirav.desai@childrens.harvard.edu.
Sarah HarneyDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Roshan RazaDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Alyaa Al-IbraheemiDepartment of Pathology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Nick ShillingfordDepartment of Pathology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Paul D MitchellClinical Research Center, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Maureen M JonasDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Boston Children's Hospital · US

Funding

STRUCTURE-FUNCTION RELATIONSHIPS IN THE ALIMENTARY TRACTP30DK034854 · NIDDK · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI WAYNE I LENCER · 1986 to 2026
$32.4M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK034854
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess whether the degree of steatosis as determined by controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) measurements correlates with that observed on liver biopsies in a single-center pediatric and young adult cohort. STUDY

designThis cross-sectional study included patients undergoing liver biopsy as part of standard clinical care between January 25, 2012, and April 1, 2015, at Boston Children's Hospital. Eligible patients, with a variety of liver diseases, had CAP measurements within 1 year of biopsy. CAP values were compared across histologic steatosis grades using ANOVA.

resultsSixty-nine patients (mean age, 16.0 ± 2.9 years; 62% male) were studied. CAP measurements were obtained at a median of 1.3 months (IQR, 0.5-3.2) after biopsy. Of the 69 subjects, 23 had steatosis on biopsy. Mean CAP value (dB/m) for subjects with no steatosis was 198 ± 37 vs 290 ± 47 for subjects with steatosis (P < .0001). There were statistically significant differences between CAP values in individuals with no steatosis vs mild/moderate steatosis (P < .0001), no steatosis vs marked steatosis (P < .0001), and mild/moderate vs marked steatosis (P = .004).

conclusionThis study demonstrated a difference in CAP between no steatosis and steatosis, and between grades of steatosis. CAP may be a useful noninvasive tool to detect hepatic steatosis in children.

Indexed as

Elasticity Imaging TechniquesAdolescentBiopsyChildCross-Sectional StudiesFatty LiverFemaleHumansLiverMalePredictive Value of TestsSensitivity and SpecificityYoung Adultchildelastographyfatty liverliver diseaseNAFLDnon-alcoholic fatty liver disease

Identifiers

PMID27039224
PMCPMC5105890
OpenAlexW2331952462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.