Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27039105›Full record

ArticleArchives of toxicology2017

Metabolomic network analysis of estrogen-stimulated MCF-7 cells: a comparison of overrepresentation analysis, quantitative enrichment analysis and pathway analysis versus metabolite network analysis.

Alexandra Maertens, Mounir Bouhifd, Liang Zhao, Shelly Odwin-DaCosta, Andre Kleensang, James D Yager, Thomas Hartung

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of toxicology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Autophagy-Related Genes in Atherosclerosis.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alexandra MaertensDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Mounir BouhifdDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Liang ZhaoDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Shelly Odwin-DaCostaDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Andre KleensangDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
James D YagerDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Edyth H. Schoenrich Professor of Preventive Medicine, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Thomas HartungDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. THartung@jhsph.edu.
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Mapping the Human Toxome by Systems ToxicologyR01ES020750 · NIEHS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI HARTUNG, THOMAS · 2011 to 2015
$6.0M
NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES020750
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the context of the Human Toxome project, mass spectroscopy-based metabolomics characterization of estrogen-stimulated MCF-7 cells was studied in order to support the untargeted deduction of pathways of toxicity. A targeted and untargeted approach using overrepresentation analysis (ORA), quantitative enrichment analysis (QEA) and pathway analysis (PA) and a metabolite network approach were compared. Any untargeted approach necessarily has some noise in the data owing to artifacts, outliers and misidentified metabolites. Depending on the chemical analytical choices (sample extraction, chromatography, instrument and settings, etc.), only a partial representation of all metabolites will be achieved, biased by both the analytical methods and the database used to identify the metabolites. Here, we show on the one hand that using a data analysis approach based exclusively on pathway annotations has the potential to miss much that is of interest and, in the case of misidentified metabolites, can produce perturbed pathways that are statistically significant yet uninformative for the biological sample at hand. On the other hand, a targeted approach, by narrowing its focus and minimizing (but not eliminating) misidentifications, renders the likelihood of a spurious pathway much smaller, but the limited number of metabolites also makes statistical significance harder to achieve. To avoid an analysis dependent on pathways, we built a de novo network using all metabolites that were different at 24 h with and without estrogen with a p value <0.01 (53) in the STITCH database, which links metabolites based on known reactions in the main metabolic network pathways but also based on experimental evidence and text mining. The resulting network contained a "connected component" of 43 metabolites and helped identify non-endogenous metabolites as well as pathways not visible by annotation-based approaches. Moreover, the most highly connected metabolites (energy metabolites such as pyruvate and alpha-ketoglutarate, as well as amino acids) showed only a modest change between proliferation with and without estrogen. Here, we demonstrate that estrogen has subtle but potentially phenotypically important alterations in the acyl-carnitine fatty acids, acetyl-putrescine and succinoadenosine, in addition to likely subtle changes in key energy metabolites that, however, could not be verified consistently given the technical limitations of this approach. Finally, we show that a network-based approach combined with text mining identifies pathways that would otherwise neither be considered statistically significant on their own nor be identified via ORA, QEA, or PA.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalChromatography, High Pressure LiquidComputational BiologyDatabases, FactualData MiningEndocrine DisruptorsEnergy MetabolismEstradiolEstrogensHumansMCF-7 CellsMetabolomeMetabolomicsReproducibility of ResultsSecondary MetabolismSpectrometry, Mass, Electrospray IonizationEndocrine DisruptorsEstradiolEstrogensBioinformaticsComputational toxicologyEndocrine disruptionEstrogenMetabolomicsPathway analysis

Identifiers

PMID27039105
PMCPMC5047848
OpenAlexW2316215170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.