Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27039046›Full record

ArticleAnnals of epidemiology2016

The spatial distribution of gender differences in obesity prevalence differs from overall obesity prevalence among US adults.

Danielle R Gartner, Daniel R Taber, Jana A Hirsch, Whitney R Robinson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of epidemiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Limiting feeding to the active phase reduces blood pressure without the necessity of caloric reduction or fat mass loss.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2018
    Article
  15. Obesity among Women in Turkey.Iranian journal of public health · 2018
    Article
  16. Gender Difference and Spatial Heterogeneity in Local Obesity.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Danielle R GartnerDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill; Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill.
Daniel R TaberDepartment of Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston-Austin Regional Campus, Austin.
Jana A HirschCarolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill.
Whitney R RobinsonDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill; Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill. Electronic address: whitney_robinson@unc.edu.

Funding

POPULATION STUDIEST32HD007168 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ELIZABETH A FRANKENBERG · 1985 to 2026
$13.8M
Carolina Population CenterR24HD050924 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI MORGAN, SAMUEL PHILIP · 2005 to 2014
$10.0M
Research Services CoreP2CHD050924 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KAREN B GUZZO · 2015 to 2026
$9.6M
Racial disparities in cancer outcomes: quantifying modifiable mechanismsK01CA172717 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ROBINSON, WHITNEY RAGAN · 2012 to 2016
$639k
NCI NIH HHS K01 CA172717NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD050924NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD050924NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007168
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAlthough obesity disparities between racial and socioeconomic groups have been well characterized, those based on gender and geography have not been as thoroughly documented. This study describes obesity prevalence by state, gender, and race and/or ethnicity to (1) characterize obesity gender inequality, (2) determine if the geographic distribution of inequality is spatially clustered, and (3) contrast the spatial clustering patterns of obesity gender inequality with overall obesity prevalence.

methodsData from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's 2013 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System were used to calculate state-specific obesity prevalence and gender inequality measures. Global and local Moran's indices were calculated to determine spatial autocorrelation.

resultsAge-adjusted, state-specific obesity prevalence difference and ratio measures show spatial autocorrelation (z-score = 4.89, P-value < .001). Local Moran's indices indicate the spatial distributions of obesity prevalence and obesity gender inequalities are not the same. High and low values of obesity prevalence and gender inequalities cluster in different areas of the United States.

conclusionsClustering of gender inequality suggests that spatial processes operating at the state level, such as occupational or physical activity policies or social norms, are involved in the etiology of the inequality and necessitate further attention to the determinates of obesity gender inequality.

Indexed as

Sex FactorsSocial ClassAdultBehavioral Risk Factor Surveillance SystemEthnicityExerciseFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMinority GroupsObesityPrevalenceRacial GroupsSocioeconomic FactorsSpatial AnalysisBehavioral risk factor surveillanceContinental population groupsEnvironmentEthnic groupsFemaleMaleObesitySocial environmentSpatial analysisUnited States

Identifiers

PMID27039046
PMCPMC4901384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.