Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27038991›Full record

SynthesisInternational urogynecology journal2017

Treatment of neovaginal prolapse: case report and systematic review of the literature.

Mathias Neron, Gwenaël Ferron, Pierre Vieille, Vincent Letouzey, Brigitte Fatton, Renaud de Tayrac

Abstract readCase ReportsSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International urogynecology journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mathias NeronCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nimes, 4 Place du Pr Robert Debré, 30029, Nîmes, France. mathias.neron@orange.fr.
Gwenaël FerronInstitut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse, 1 Av. Irène Joliot-Curie, 31059, Toulouse, France.
Pierre VieilleCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nimes, 4 Place du Pr Robert Debré, 30029, Nîmes, France.
Vincent LetouzeyCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nimes, 4 Place du Pr Robert Debré, 30029, Nîmes, France.
Brigitte FattonCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nimes, 4 Place du Pr Robert Debré, 30029, Nîmes, France.
Renaud de TayracCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nimes, 4 Place du Pr Robert Debré, 30029, Nîmes, France.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes · FRInstitut Claudius Regaud · FRUniversité de Montpellier · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisNeovaginal prolapse (NP) is a rare event as few cases have been reported in the literature. Its management is complex and depends on the initial pathology, the vaginoplasty technique and the patient's history. We present a review the literature on this rare event.

methodsWe describe the case of a 72-year-old woman who presented with NP 1 year after pelvic exenteration and radiotherapy for recurrent cervical carcinoma associated with vaginal reconstruction by shaped-tube omentoplasty. She had undergone two previous surgical procedures (posterior sacrospinous ligament suspension and partial colpocleisis), but NP recurred each time within a few months. We performed an anterior approach to the sacrospinous ligament and inserted a mesh under the anterior wall of the neovagina, with the two mesh arms driven through the sacrospinous ligament in a tension-free manner (Uphold Lite® system). The MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials and OpenGrey databases were systematically searched for literature on the management of NP following bowel vaginoplasty, mechanical dilatation, graciloplasty, omentoplasty, rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap and the Davydov procedure.

resultsThe postoperative course in the patient whose case is described was uneventful and after 1 year of follow-up, the anatomical results and patient satisfaction were good. The systematic search of the databases revealed several studies on the treatment of NP using abdominal and vaginal approaches, and these are reviewed.

conclusionsOverall, sacrocolpopexy would appear to be a good option for the treatment of prolapse after bowel vaginoplasty, but too few cases have been reported to establish this technique as the standard management of NP.

Indexed as

Surgical MeshAgedCarcinomaFemaleHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPelvic ExenterationPlastic Surgery ProceduresPostoperative ComplicationsSacrumTreatment OutcomeUterine Cervical NeoplasmsUterine ProlapseVaginaNeovaginaOmentoplastyPelvic ExenterationProlapseSacrospinous ligamentUphold

Identifiers

PMID27038991
OpenAlexW2314799130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.