Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27038949›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2016

Decreased microbial diversity and Lactobacillus group in the intestine of geriatric giant pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca).

Zhirong Peng, Dong Zeng, Qiang Wang, Lili Niu, Xueqin Ni, Fuqin Zou, Mingyue Yang, Hao Sun, Yi Zhou, Qian Liu and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Rosmarinic Acid Ameliorates PMAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  2. Giant Panda Feces-DerivedVeterinary sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Frontiers in microbiology · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zhirong PengAnimal Microecology Institute, College of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, China.
Dong ZengKey Laboratory of Animal Disease and Human Health of Sichuan Province, Chengdu, 611130, China.
Qiang WangChengdu Wildlife Institute, Chengdu Zoo, Chengdu, 610081, China.
Lili NiuChengdu Wildlife Institute, Chengdu Zoo, Chengdu, 610081, China.
Xueqin NiAnimal Microecology Institute, College of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, China. xueqinni@foxmail.com.
Fuqin ZouAnimal Microecology Institute, College of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, China.
Mingyue YangKey Laboratory of Animal Disease and Human Health of Sichuan Province, Chengdu, 611130, China.
Hao SunKey Laboratory of Animal Disease and Human Health of Sichuan Province, Chengdu, 611130, China.
Yi ZhouAnimal Microecology Institute, College of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, China.
Qian LiuKey Laboratory of Animal Disease and Human Health of Sichuan Province, Chengdu, 611130, China.
Zhongqiong YinKey Laboratory of Animal Disease and Human Health of Sichuan Province, Chengdu, 611130, China.
Kangcheng PanAnimal Microecology Institute, College of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, China.
Bo JingAnimal Microecology Institute, College of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, China.
Sichuan Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has been established beyond doubt that giant panda genome lacks lignin-degrading related enzyme, gastrointestinal microbes may play a vital role in digestion of highly fibrous bamboo diet. However, there is not much information available about the intestinal bacteria composition in captive giant pandas with different ages. In this study, we compared the intestinal bacterial community of 12 captive giant pandas from three different age groups (subadults, adults, and geriatrics) through PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) and real-time PCR analysis. Results indicated that microbial diversity in the intestine of adults was significantly higher than that of the geriatrics (p < 0.05), but not significant compared to the subadults (p > 0.05). The predominant bands in DGGE patterns shared by the twelve pandas were related to Firmicutes and Proteobacteria. Additionally, in comparison to healthy individuals, antibiotic-treated animals showed partial microbial dysbiosis. Real-time PCR analyses confirmed a significantly higher abundance of the Lactobacillus in the fecal microbiota of adults (p < 0.05), while other bacterial groups and species detected did not significantly differ among the three age groups (p > 0.05). This study revealed that captive giant pandas with different ages showed different intestinal bacteria composition.

Indexed as

BiodiversityGastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsFecesFemaleIntestinesLactobacillusMalePhylogenyPolymerase Chain ReactionUrsidaeCaptive giant pandaDietIntestine microfloraPCR-DGGEReal-time PCR

Identifiers

PMID27038949
OpenAlexW2312914324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.