Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27038935›Full record

ArticleMagma (New York, N.Y.)2016

Scan time minimization in hepatic diffusion-weighted imaging: evaluation of the simultaneous multislice acceleration technique with different acceleration factors and gradient preparation schemes.

Jana Taron, Petros Martirosian, Nina F Schwenzer, Michael Erb, Thomas Kuestner, Jakob Weiß, Ahmed Othman, Mike Notohamiprodjo, Konstantin Nikolaou, Christina Schraml

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Magma (New York, N.Y.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jana TaronDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Petros MartirosianSection on Experimental Radiology, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Nina F SchwenzerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Michael ErbDepartment of Biomedical Magnetic Resonance, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Thomas KuestnerInstitute of Signal Processing and System Theory, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
Jakob WeißDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Ahmed OthmanDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Mike NotohamiprodjoDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Konstantin NikolaouDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Christina SchramlDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany. christina.schraml@med.uni-tuebingen.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate simultaneous multislice (sms) accelerated diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) of the liver in comparison to conventional sequences. MATERIALS AND

methodsTen volunteers underwent DWI of the liver at 1.5 T. Four different sms-accelerated sequences with monopolar and bipolar gradient preparation (MP, BP) and acceleration factors 2 and 3 (sms2-DWI, sms3-DWI) were compared to conventional DWI (c-DWI). Image quality criteria rated on a 5-point Likert scale (5 = excellent), image quality sum scores (maximum 120), and ADC were compared using Friedman test and Dunn-Bonferroni post hoc test. Bland-Altman plots were calculated for ADC comparison. p values <0.05 were considered significant.

resultsSms2-DWI offered scan time minimization of 67 % without significant difference in image quality (sum score: sms2-DWI MP/BP: 97 ± 8/92 ± 9; c-DWI MP/BP: 99 ± 8/97 ± 8). Sms3-DWI offered slight additional scan time minimization with significantly inferior image quality (sum score: sms3-DWI MP/BP: 75 ± 14/69 ± 14; p < 0.001). MP preparation provided slightly higher image quality in sms-DWI without statistical significance. ADC in sms-DWI were significantly lower (sms2-DWI MP 1.01 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s; c-DWI MP 1.20 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s; p < 0.001).

conclusionSms2-DWI provides considerable scan time minimization without significant shortcomings in image quality. Sms3-DWI provides significantly inferior image quality without further scan time minimization. Potentially lower ADC in sms-DWI should be considered in clinical routine.

Indexed as

AdultDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansImage EnhancementImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLiverMaleReproducibility of ResultsTime FactorsBipolarDiffusion-weighted imagingLiverMonopolarScan time minimizationSimultaneous multislice

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.