Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27038791›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2016

Variable use of amiodarone is associated with a greater risk of recurrence of atrial fibrillation in the critically ill.

Goran Mitrić, Andrew Udy, Hiran Bandeshe, Pierre Clement, Rob Boots

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Goran MitrićSchool of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Andrew UdyDepartment of Intensive Care and Hyperbaric Medicine, The Alfred Hospital, Prahran, VIC, Australia.
Hiran BandesheDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Herston, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Pierre ClementDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Herston, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Rob BootsDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Herston, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. r.boots@uq.edu.au.
Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital · AUUniversity of Queensland · AUThe Alfred Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAtrial fibrillation is a common rhythm disturbance in the general medical-surgical intensive care unit. Amiodarone is a popular drug in this setting but evidence to inform clinical practice remains scarce. We aimed to identify whether variation in the clinical use of amiodarone was associated with recurrent atrial fibrillation.

methodsThis was a retrospective audit of 177 critically ill patients who developed new-onset atrial fibrillation after admission to a tertiary level medical-surgical trauma intensive care unit. Patterns of amiodarone prescription (including dosage schedule and duration) were assessed in relation to recurrence of atrial fibrillation during the intensive care unit stay. Known recurrence risk factors, such as inotrope administration, cardiac disease indices, Charlson Comorbidity Index, magnesium concentrations, fluid balance, and potassium concentrations, were also included in adjusted analysis using forward stepwise logistic regression modelling.

resultsThe cohort had a median (interquartile range) age of 69 years (60-75), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evalution II score of 22 (17-28) and Charlson Comorbidity Index of 2 (1-4). A bolus dose of amiodarone followed by infusion (P = 0.02), in addition to continuing amiodarone infusion through to discharge from the intensive care unit (P < 0.001), were associated with less recurrent dysrhythmia. Recurrence after successful treatment was associated with ceasing amiodarone while an inotrope infusion continued (P < 0.001), and was more common in patients with a prior history of congestive cardiac failure (P = 0.04), and a diagnosis of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (P = 0.02).

conclusionsAmiodarone should be administered as a bolus dose followed immediately with an infusion when treating atrial fibrillation in the medical-surgical intensive care unit. Consideration should be given to continuing amiodarone infusions in patients on inotropes until they are ceased.

Indexed as

AgedAmiodaroneAnti-Arrhythmia AgentsAtrial FibrillationCohort StudiesCritical IllnessFemaleHumansInfusions, IntravenousIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesAmiodaroneAnti-Arrhythmia AgentsAmiodaroneAtrial fibrillationCritical careRecurrence

Identifiers

PMID27038791
PMCPMC4818931
OpenAlexW2317834957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.