Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27038608›Full record

Trial reportArthritis research & therapy2016

A phase III randomized study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CT-P13 compared with reference infliximab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: 54-week results from the PLANETRA study.

Dae Hyun Yoo, Artur Racewicz, Jan Brzezicki, Roman Yatsyshyn, Edgardo Tobias Arteaga, Asta Baranauskaite, Carlos Abud-Mendoza, Sandra Navarra, Vladimir Kadinov, Irmgadt Goecke Sariego and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Arthritis research & therapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01217086 (Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Phase 3 Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 68 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
17.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01217086 phase3completednot on this map

Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Phase 3 Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorCelltrionRan2010 to 2012Enrolled617ConditionsRheumatoid ArthritisArmsInfliximab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 171 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 10 institutions in 8 countries.

Dae Hyun YooHanyang University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Artur RacewiczNZOZ Osteo-Medic, Bialystok, Poland.
Jan BrzezickiWojewodzki Szpital Zespolony, Elblag, Poland.
Roman YatsyshynIvano-Frankivsk Regional Clinical Hospital, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine.
Edgardo Tobias ArteagaHospital Militar Central, Bogota, Colombia.
Asta BaranauskaiteLithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Carlos Abud-MendozaHospital Central Dr. Ignacio Morones Prieto, San Luis Potosi, Mexico.
Sandra NavarraSt. Luke's Medical Center, Quezon City, Philippines.
Vladimir KadinovUniversity Hospital St. Marina, Varna, Bulgaria.
Irmgadt Goecke SariegoProsalud y Cia Ltda, Santiago, Chile.
Seung Suh HongCELLTRION, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Sung Young LeeCELLTRION, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Won ParkInha University Hospital, Incheon, Republic of Korea. parkwon@inha.ac.kr.
Celltrion (South Korea) · KRHanyang University Seoul Hospital · KRHospital Central Dr. Ignacio Morones Prieto · MXHospital Militar Central · COInha University Hospital · KRIvano-Frankivsk National Medical University · UALithuanian University of Health Sciences · LTSt. Luke's Medical Center · PHUniversity Hospital St. Marina · BGWojewódzki Szpital Zespolony · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCT-P13 (Remsima®, Inflectra®) is a biosimilar of the infliximab reference product (RP; Remicade®). The aim of this study was to compare the 54-week efficacy, immunogenicity, safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of CT-P13 and RP in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

methodsIn this multinational phase III double-blind study, patients with active RA and an inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX) were randomized (1:1) to receive CT-P13 (3 mg/kg) or RP (3 mg/kg) at weeks 0, 2, 6 and then every 8 weeks to week 54 in combination with MTX (12.5-25 mg/week). Efficacy endpoints included American College of Rheumatology (ACR)20, ACR50 and ACR70 response rates, Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28), Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI), Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response rates, patient-reported outcomes and joint damage progression. Immunogenicity, safety and PK/PD outcomes were also assessed.

resultsOf 606 randomized patients, 455 (CT-P13 233, RP 222) were treated up to week 54. At week 54, ACR20 response rate was highly similar between groups (CT-P13 74.7 %, RP 71.3 %). ACR50 and ACR70 response rates were also comparable between groups (CT-P13 43.6 % and 21.3 %, respectively; RP 43.1 % and 19.9 %, respectively). DAS28, SDAI and CDAI decreased from baseline to week 54 to a similar extent with CT-P13 and RP. Radiographic progression measured by Sharp scores as modified by van der Heijde was also comparable. With both treatments, patient assessments of pain, disease activity and physical ability, as well as mean scores on the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), improved markedly at week 14 and remained stable thereafter up to week 54. The proportion of patients positive for antidrug antibodies at week 54 was similar between the two groups: 41.1 % and 36.0 % with CT-P13 and RP, respectively. CT-P13 was well tolerated and had a similar safety profile to RP. PK/PD results were also comparable between CT-P13 and RP.

conclusionsCT-P13 and RP were comparable in terms of efficacy (including radiographic progression), immunogenicity and PK/PD up to week 54. The safety profile of CT-P13 was also similar to that of RP.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01217086 . Registered 4 Oct 2010.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAntibodies, MonoclonalAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansInfliximabMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAntibodies, MonoclonalAntirheumatic AgentsCT-P13InfliximabACR20BiosimilarCT-P13EfficacyImmunogenicityInfliximabPharmacokineticsRheumatoid arthritisSafetySharp score

Identifiers

PMID27038608
PMCPMC4818886
OpenAlexW2314763045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.