Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27038446›Full record

ReviewDigestive diseases and sciences2016

Diagnosis and Surveillance of Barrett's Esophagus: Addressing the Transatlantic Divide.

Saad Ghaus, Helmut Neumann, Humayun Muhammad, Gian Eugenio Tontini, Sauid Ishaq

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Saad GhausGastroenterology Department, Dudley Group Hospitals, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, UK.
Helmut NeumannDepartment of Medicine, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Humayun MuhammadGastroenterology Department, Dudley Group Hospitals, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, UK.
Gian Eugenio TontiniGastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Italy.
Sauid IshaqGastroenterology Department, Dudley Group Hospitals, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, UK. sauid.ishaq@dgh.nhs.uk.
Birmingham City University · GBDudley Group NHS Foundation Trust · GBIRCCS Policlinico San Donato · ITSt. George's University · GDUniversitätsklinikum Erlangen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBarrett's esophagus is a premalignant condition of the esophagus leading to esophageal adenocarcinoma. No consensus exists between the UK and USA concerning the diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus. Although the diagnostic procedure is common, the required findings and diagnostic criteria vary. Both guidelines require endoscopy showing columnar epithelia lining the esophagus, but the US guidelines require the additional finding of intestinal metaplasia on biopsy to confirm diagnosis. Achievement of a consensus is of particular importance due to the established progression from Barrett's esophagus to esophageal adenocarcinoma. Of further importance is the increasing incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma, a condition with poor overall survival, leading to various opinions on the utility of surveillance in patients. DISCUSSION: A review of the vast array of literature revealed that substantial evidence exists in favor of both diagnostic criteria; hence, there is no easy way to identify the "correct" method of diagnosing Barrett's esophagus. USA recommends surveillance of Barrett's esophagus, whereas UK does not advocate it unless dysplasia is present. Surveillance was found to be effective, but this varied as did cost-effectiveness. Further research into diagnostic methods for Barrett's esophagus is needed to address areas of limited understanding, such that agreement can be reached and practice standardized. Surveillance was generally advocated, but with different criteria and time intervals, and new methods are being evaluated.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicAdenocarcinomaAftercareBarrett EsophagusConsensusCost-Benefit AnalysisDisease ProgressionEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagoscopyEsophagusHumansMetaplasiaPrecancerous ConditionsUnited KingdomUnited StatesBarrett’s esophagusDiagnosisEndoscopyIntestinal metaplasiaSurveillance

Identifiers

PMID27038446
OpenAlexW2331250903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.