ArticleCurrent genetics2016
Development and validation of a custom microarray for global transcriptome profiling of the fungus Aspergillus nidulans.
Article in Current genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transcriptome profiling is a powerful tool for identifying gene networks from whole genome expression analysis in many living species. Here is described the first extensively characterized platform using Agilent microarray technology for transcriptome analysis in the filamentous fungus Aspergillus (Emericella) nidulans. We developed and validated a reliable gene expression microarray in 8 × 15 K format, with predictive and experimental data establishing its specificity and sensitivity. Either one or two 60-mer oligonucleotide probes were selected for each of 10,550 nuclear as well as 20 mitochondrial coding sequences. More than 99 % of probes were predicted to hybridize with 100 % identity to their aimed specific A. nidulans target only. Probe sensitivity was supported by a highly narrow distribution of melting temperatures together with thermodynamic features, which strongly favored probe-target perfect match hybridization, in comparison with predicted secondary structures. Array quality was evaluated through transcriptome comparison of two A. nidulans strains, differing by the presence or not of Escherichia coli LacZ transgene. High signal-to-noise ratios were measured, and signal reproducibility was established at intra-probe and inter-probe levels. Reproducibility of microarray performances was assessed by high correlation between two-color dye signals and between technical replicates. Results were confirmed by RT-qPCR analysis on five genes. Though it covers 100 % of the A. nidulans targeted coding sequences, this low density array allows limited experimental costs and simplified data analysis process, making it suitable for studying gene expression in this model organism through large numbers of experimental conditions, in basic, biomedical or industrial microbiology research fields.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27038308What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.