Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27038203›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2016

Voluntary action and tactile sensory feedback in the intentional binding effect.

Ke Zhao, Li Hu, Fangbing Qu, Qian Cui, Qiuhong Piao, Hui Xu, Yanyan Li, Liang Wang, Xiaolan Fu

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ke ZhaoKey Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 16 Lincui Rd., Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100101, China. zhaok@psych.ac.cn.
Li HuKey Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 16 Lincui Rd., Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100101, China.
Fangbing QuState Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Qian CuiState Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Qiuhong PiaoKey Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 16 Lincui Rd., Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100101, China.
Hui XuKey Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 16 Lincui Rd., Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100101, China.
Yanyan LiKey Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 16 Lincui Rd., Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100101, China.
Liang WangKey Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 16 Lincui Rd., Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100101, China.
Xiaolan FuState Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNCenter for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology · CNUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The intentional binding effect refers to a subjective compression over a temporal interval between the start point initialized by a voluntary action and the endpoint signaled by an external sensory (visual or audio) feedback. The present study aimed to explore the influence of tactile sensory feedback on this binding effect by comparing voluntary key-press actions with voluntary key-release actions. In experiment 1, each participant was instructed to report the perceived interval (in ms) between an action and the subsequent visual sensory feedback. In this task, either the action (key-press or key-release) was voluntarily performed by the participant or a kinematically identical movement was passively applied to the left index finger of the participant. In experiment 2, we explored whether the difference in the perception of time was affected by the direction of action. In experiment 3, we developed an apparatus in which two parallel laser beams were generated by a laser emission unit and detected by a laser receiver unit; this allowed the movement of the left index finger to be detected without it touching a keyboard (i.e., without any tactile sensory feedback). Convergent results from all of the experiments showed that the temporal binding effect was only observed when the action was both voluntary and involved physical contact with the key, suggesting that the combination of intention and tactile sensory feedback, as a form of top-down processing, likely distracted attention from temporal events and caused the different binding effects.

Indexed as

IntentionAdultFeedback, SensoryFemaleHumansMaleMotor ActivityPsychomotor PerformanceTouch PerceptionVisual PerceptionVolitionYoung AdultIntentional bindingKey-pressKey-releaseTactile sensory feedback

Identifiers

PMID27038203
OpenAlexW2329544130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.