ArticleDrugs & aging2016
Use of Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulants in Nonagenarians: A Call for More Data.
Article in Drugs & aging, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Warfarin monitoring in nursing homes assessed by case histories. Do recommendations and electronic alerts affect judgements?Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2017Trial
- Use of Direct Acting Oral Anticoagulants in Elderly Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Multicenter, Cross-Sectional Study in Spain.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Oral Anticoagulants in the Oldest Old with Recent Stroke and Atrial Fibrillation.Annals of neurology · 2022Article
- Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Timing of Hip Fracture Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
- Serum Concentrations and Elimination Rates of Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) in Older Hip Fracture Patients Hospitalized for Surgery: A Pilot Study.Drugs & aging · 2019Article
- Management of patients with stroke treated with direct oral anticoagulants.Journal of neurology · 2018Review
- Quality of direct oral anticoagulant prescribing in elderly patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: results from a large urban health system.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2018Article
- Treatment of atrial fibrillation in nursing homes: A place for direct acting oral anticoagulants?The journal of nursing home research sciences · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prevalence and embolic risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) increase with age. Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) or direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) reduce the risk of stroke or embolism. The aim of this review was to summarize the paucity of information regarding the safety and efficacy of DOACs in AF patients aged 90 years or older. The maximum age of included patients is not listed in any of the available DOAC investigating trials and registries, thus it is unclear if nonagenarians were included. Additionally, we could not find any subgroup analysis addressing this issue. There is an urgent need to collect more information on the safety and efficacy of oral anticoagulants in nonagenarians, especially regarding the role of DOACs, which are increasingly prescribed to this group of patients despite the lack of data. The best solution to this problem would be a prospective, randomized trial in this group of patients, however that would require a large investment of time, effort, and funds. In the meantime, we suggest subgroup analyses addressing the effects and safety of VKAs versus DOACs in nonagenarians, in case they have been included in previously completed or ongoing trials or registries. This could be feasible and would be desirable in view of the large amount of data already accumulated. Irrespective of age, anemia in patients receiving DOACs should be carefully investigated to rule out occult blood loss. With their known interaction profile and the possibility of monitoring these drugs, VKAs should be favored over DOACs in nonagenarians until more data are available regarding the safety of DOACs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.