Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27037889›Full record

ArticleThe Science of the total environment2016

The impact of a smoke-free policy on environmental tobacco smoke exposure in public housing developments.

Piers MacNaughton, Gary Adamkiewicz, Raphael E Arku, Jose Vallarino, Douglas E Levy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Science of the total environment, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Guest Support for Outdoor Smoke-Free Policies within a Homeless Shelter.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Urinary Cotinine and Cotinine + Trans-3'-Hydroxycotinine (TNE-2) Cut-points for Distinguishing Tobacco Use from Nonuse in the United States: PATH Study (2013-2014).Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2021
    Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Subsidized Housing and Adult Asthma in Boston, 2010-2015.American journal of public health · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Time to Track Health Outcomes of Smoke-Free Multiunit Housing.American journal of preventive medicine · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Piers MacNaughtonDepartment of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: pom422@mail.harvard.edu.
Gary AdamkiewiczDepartment of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Raphael E ArkuDepartment of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Jose VallarinoDepartment of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Douglas E LevyMongan Institute for Health Policy, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

TRAINING AND CAREER DEVELOPMENTP50CA148596 · NCI · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI SORENSEN, GLORIAN C · 2010 to 2014
$10.7M
Reducing Environmental Tobacco Smoke Exposure in Public HousingR01HL112212 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI LEVY, DOUGLAS · 2012 to 2020
$5.0M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA148596NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL112212
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSmoke-free housing policies have the potential to reduce secondhand smoke (SHS) exposures for residents of multi-unit housing. Since common areas represent a pathway of SHS movement between units, smoke-free policies would be expected to reduce SHS in these microenvironments.

methodsWeek-long air nicotine and PM2.5 (particulate matter below 2.5μm in aerodynamic diameter) samples were collected in the common areas of 10 Boston Housing Authority (BHA) and 6 Cambridge Housing Authority (CHA) buildings from January 2012 to October 2013. We also measured one outdoor PM level at each study building. Samples from BHA included pre and post- smoke-free policy measurements. Each development was visited three times over the course of the study period. The effect of the smoking ban on indoor PM2.5 was examined using generalized mixed effect models to accommodate repeated measurement at each site. Changes in nicotine concentrations were modeled using quantile mixed regression to reduce the impact of outliers.

resultsAfter controlling for season, site, and background PM2.5 concentrations, PM2.5 levels were 4.05μg/m(3) (p-value=0.09) lower in BHA after the smoke-free policy was implemented in the summer of 2012, compared with CHA developments, which had no smoking policy in place. Similarly, nicotine levels decreased by 57% (p-value=0.08) in Boston relative to Cambridge after the ban.

conclusionsOur findings support the use of smoke-free policies as an effective tool to reduce SHS exposure and protect non-smokers, especially residents of multi-unit housing.

Indexed as

Smoke-Free PolicyAir PollutantsAir Pollution, IndoorBostonEnvironmental ExposurePublic HousingSmokingTobacco Smoke PollutionAir PollutantsTobacco Smoke PollutionMulti-unit housingNicotineParticulate matterSmoking interventionTobacco smoke exposure

Identifiers

PMID27037889
PMCPMC4856038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.