Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27037706›Full record

ReviewCurrent diabetes reports2016

Safety and Tolerability of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists Utilizing Data from the Exenatide Clinical Trial Development Program.

Hui Peng, Laura L Want, Vanita R Aroda

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current diabetes reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Sitagliptin Treatment After Total Pancreatectomy With Islet Autotransplantation: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2017
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hui PengMedStar Health Research Institute, 6562 Belcrest Rd, Suite 700, Hyattsville, MD, 20782, USA.
Laura L WantMedStar Health Research Institute, 6562 Belcrest Rd, Suite 700, Hyattsville, MD, 20782, USA.
Vanita R ArodaMedStar Health Research Institute, 6562 Belcrest Rd, Suite 700, Hyattsville, MD, 20782, USA. vanita.aroda@medstar.net.
MedStar Health · USMedStar Washington Hospital Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have demonstrated benefits for patients with type 2 diabetes including A1C reduction and weight loss with minimal risk of hypoglycemia. This article provides an evidence-based update of safety and tolerability considerations for the clinical use of GLP-1RAs as a class, with a specific detailed review of data from the exenatide clinical trial development program, which has the longest history and availability of safety and tolerability data as the first-approved GLP-1RA. Specific areas covered include comparative risk of hypoglycemia, as well as pancreatic, thyroid, and cardiovascular safety data; clinical guidance regarding current safety and tolerability data is also reviewed.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicGlucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor AgonistsAnimalsAntibodiesAntibody FormationDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2HumansHypoglycemiaHypoglycemic AgentsAntibodiesGlucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor AgonistsHypoglycemic AgentsCardiovascularExenatideGLP-1 receptor agonistsIncretinPancreatitisSafety

Identifiers

PMID27037706
OpenAlexW2332435010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.