Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27037391›Full record

ArticleClinical medicine (London, England)2016

Syphilis: presentations in general medicine.

Farai Nyatsanza, Craig Tipple

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical medicine (London, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. A Rare Case of Widely Disseminated Syphilis.Acta dermato-venereologica · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Genital ulcer disease: A review.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Syphilis.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2019
    Article
  17. Classical syphilitic lesions from the museum.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2019
    Article
  18. Predictors of unfavorable outcome in neurosyphilis: Multicenter ID-IRI Study.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Farai NyatsanzaJefferiss Wing for Sexual Health, Imperial College NHS Healthcare Trust, London, UK.
Craig TippleJefferiss Wing for Sexual Health, Imperial College NHS Healthcare Trust, London, UK craig.tipple@imperial.nhs.uk.
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Syphilis is caused by the spirochete bacteriumTreponema pallidumand can be transmitted both sexually and from mother to child.T pallidumcan infect any organ and produces a clinical disease with a relapsing and remitting course. It is not hard to see, therefore, why it is often described as the great mimic. In this review, we provide an update of modern syphilis epidemiology, clinical presentations, and testing and treatment strategies.

Indexed as

SyphilisDisease ManagementHumansepidemiologyneurosyphilisSyphilistreatmentTreponema pallidum

Identifiers

PMID27037391
PMCPMC4952975
OpenAlexW2321786336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.