Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27037279›Full record

ArticleExperimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.)2016

Evaluation of a bilayered, micropatterned hydrogel dressing for full-thickness wound healing.

Chelsea M Magin, Dylan B Neale, Michael C Drinker, Bradley J Willenberg, Shravanthi T Reddy, Krista Md La Perle, Gregory S Schultz, Anthony B Brennan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Tissue-Engineered Peripheral Nerve Interfaces.Advanced functional materials · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chelsea M MaginSharklet Technologies, Inc., Aurora, CO 80045, USA cmagin@sharklet.com.
Dylan B NealeDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Michael C DrinkerSharklet Technologies, Inc., Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
Bradley J WillenbergDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA Department of Internal Medicine, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32827, USA Saisijin Biotech, LLC, Orlando, FL 32827, USA.
Shravanthi T ReddySharklet Technologies, Inc., Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
Krista Md La PerleDepartment of Veterinary Biosciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Comparative Pathology & Mouse Phenotyping Shared Resource, Comprehensive Cancer Center The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Gregory S SchultzDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Anthony B BrennanSharklet Technologies, Inc., Aurora, CO 80045, USA Saisijin Biotech, LLC, Orlando, FL 32827, USA J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.

Funding

Translational Therapeutics Research Program (TT)P30CA016058 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Tasleem J Padamsee · 1985 to 2026
$132.3M
Advanced Micro-patterned Wound Dressings for Enhanced EpithelializationR43AR067584 · NIAMS · SHARKLET TECHNOLOGIES, INC. · PI MAGIN, CHELSEA M · 2014 to 2014
$218k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016058NIAMS NIH HHS R43 AR067584
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nearly 12 million wounds are treated in emergency departments throughout the United States every year. The limitations of current treatments for complex, full-thickness wounds are the driving force for the development of new wound treatment devices that result in faster healing of both dermal and epidermal tissue. Here, a bilayered, biodegradable hydrogel dressing that uses microarchitecture to guide two key steps in the proliferative phase of wound healing, re-epithelialization, and revascularization, was evaluated in vitro in a cell migration assay and in vivo in a bipedicle ischemic rat wound model. Results indicate that the Sharklet™-micropatterned apical layer of the dressing increased artificial wound coverage by up to 64%, P = 0.024 in vitro. In vivo evaluation demonstrated that the bilayered dressing construction enhanced overall healing outcomes significantly compared to untreated wounds and that these outcomes were not significantly different from a leading clinically available wound dressing. Collectively, these results demonstrate high potential for this new dressing to effectively accelerate wound healing.

Indexed as

Wound HealingAnimalsBandagesBiocompatible MaterialsCell MovementHumansKeratinocytesMaleMaterials TestingRats, Sprague-DawleyBiocompatible MaterialsbiomaterialsgelatinhydrogelmicroarchitectureMicropatternwound healing

Identifiers

PMID27037279
PMCPMC4950347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.