Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27037210›Full record

ArticleHPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association2016

The influence of steatosis on the short- and long-term results of resection of liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma.

Emilio Ramos, Jaume Torras, Laura Lladó, Antoni Rafecas, Teresa Serrano, Sandra Lopez-Gordo, Juli Busquets, Joan Fabregat

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Unveiling the cancer risk nexus of the steatotic liver.Trends in endocrinology and metabolism: TEM · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Hepatic Metastasis from Colorectal Cancer.Euroasian journal of hepato-gastroenterology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Emilio RamosHospital Universitario de Bellvitge, Department of General Surgery, Spain. Electronic address: eramos@bellvitgehospital.cat.
Jaume TorrasHospital Universitario de Bellvitge, Department of General Surgery, Spain.
Laura LladóHospital Universitario de Bellvitge, Department of General Surgery, Spain.
Antoni RafecasHospital Universitario de Bellvitge, Department of General Surgery, Spain.
Teresa SerranoDepartment of Pathology, Spain.
Sandra Lopez-GordoHospital Universitario de Bellvitge, Department of General Surgery, Spain.
Juli BusquetsHospital Universitario de Bellvitge, Department of General Surgery, Spain.
Joan FabregatHospital Universitario de Bellvitge, Department of General Surgery, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledWe aimed to establish whether the presence of hepatic steatosis influences outcome after resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLM). PATIENTS AND

methodsPatients operated between 1990 and 2014 were divided into four groups based on the degree of hepatic steatosis. The association between hepatic steatosis and outcome was analyzed, using a multivariate and a propensity score case-match analysis.

resultsNo significant differences were observed between patients with and without steatosis in either mortality or morbidity in the complete series or after matching (3.2% vs. 3.5%/p = 0.845) (32.3% vs 31.4%/p = 0.802). Five-year survival in patients with and without steatosis were 56.5% and 46.5% respectively (p = 0.046). The steatosis had a significant protective effect in the univariate analysis (HR (95% CI) = 0.78 (0.62-0.99) p = 0.048), and was close to significance in the multivariate analysis (HR (95%) = 0.81 (0.63-1.03) p = 0.089). No significant differences were seen with regard to liver recurrence.

conclusionsThe presence of steatosis does not predict short-outcome after resection of CLM, but appears to be a favorable prognostic factor for survival. This protective effect does not depend on a decrease in liver recurrence.

Indexed as

HepatectomyAgedCarcinomaChi-Square DistributionColorectal NeoplasmsDatabases, FactualFatty LiverFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLiver NeoplasmsLogistic ModelsMaleMetastasectomyMultivariate AnalysisPropensity Score

Identifiers

PMID27037210
PMCPMC4814618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.