Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27037204›Full record

ArticleHPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association2016

External biliary drainage following major liver resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: impact on development of liver failure and biliary leakage.

Pim B Olthof, Robert J S Coelen, Jimme K Wiggers, Marc G H Besselink, Olivier R C Busch, Thomas M van Gulik

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A comparison of treatment and outcomes of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma between Eastern and Western centers.HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pim B OlthofDepartment of Surgery, Academic Medical Center - University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: p.b.olthof@amc.nl.
Robert J S CoelenDepartment of Surgery, Academic Medical Center - University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jimme K WiggersDepartment of Surgery, Academic Medical Center - University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marc G H BesselinkDepartment of Surgery, Academic Medical Center - University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Olivier R C BuschDepartment of Surgery, Academic Medical Center - University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Thomas M van GulikDepartment of Surgery, Academic Medical Center - University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreoperative biliary drainage is considered essential in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) requiring major hepatectomy with biliary-enteric reconstruction. However, evidence for postoperative biliary drainage as to protect the anastomosis is currently lacking. This study investigated the impact of postoperative external biliary drainage on the development of post-hepatectomy biliary leakage and liver failure (PHLF).

methodsAll patients who underwent major liver resection for suspected PHC between 2000 and 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Biliary leakage and PHLF was defined as grade B or higher according to the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS) criteria.

resultsEighty-nine out of 125 (71%) patients had postoperative external biliary drainage. PHLF was more prevalent in the drain group (29% versus 6%; P = 0.004). There was no difference in the incidence of biliary leakage (32% versus 36%). On multivariable analysis, postoperative external biliary drainage was identified as an independent risk factor for PHLF (Odds-ratio 10.3, 95% confidence interval 2.1-50.4; P = 0.004).

conclusionsExternal biliary drainage following major hepatectomy for PHC was associated with an increased incidence of PHLF. It is therefore not recommended to routinely use postoperative external biliary drainage, especially as there is no evidence that this decreases the risk of biliary anastomotic leakage.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnastomotic LeakBile Duct NeoplasmsBiliary Tract Surgical ProceduresChi-Square DistributionDrainageFemaleHepatectomyHumansKlatskin TumorLiver FailureLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID27037204
PMCPMC4814608
OpenAlexW2282291182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.