Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27037118›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2016

Short-Term Exposure to Coal Combustion Waste Has Little Impact on the Skin Microbiome of Adult Spring Peepers (Pseudacris crucifer).

Myra C Hughey, Jenifer B Walke, Matthew H Becker, Thomas P Umile, Elizabeth A Burzynski, Kevin P C Minbiole, Anthony A Iannetta, Celina N Santiago, William A Hopkins, Lisa K Belden

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Myra C HugheyDepartment of Biological Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA myrahughey@gmail.com.
Jenifer B WalkeDepartment of Biological Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA.
Matthew H BeckerDepartment of Biological Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA.
Thomas P UmileDepartment of Chemistry, Villanova University, Villanova, Pennsylvania, USA.
Elizabeth A BurzynskiDepartment of Chemistry, Villanova University, Villanova, Pennsylvania, USA.
Kevin P C MinbioleDepartment of Chemistry, Villanova University, Villanova, Pennsylvania, USA.
Anthony A IannettaDepartment of Chemistry, Villanova University, Villanova, Pennsylvania, USA.
Celina N SantiagoDepartment of Chemistry, Villanova University, Villanova, Pennsylvania, USA.
William A HopkinsDepartment of Fish and Wildlife Conservation, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA.
Lisa K BeldenDepartment of Biological Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA.
Villanova University · USVirginia Tech · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledDisruptions to the microbiome can impact host health as can exposure to environmental contaminants. However, few studies have addressed how environmental contaminants impact the microbiome. We explored this question for frogs that breed in wetlands contaminated with fly ash, a by-product of coal combustion that is enriched in trace elements. We found differences in the bacterial communities among a fly ash-contaminated site and several reference wetlands. We then experimentally assessed the impacts of fly ash on the skin microbiome of adult spring peepers (Pseudacris crucifer). Frogs were exposed to fly ash in the laboratory for 12 h, the duration of a typical breeding event, and the skin microbiome was assessed after 5 days (experiment 1) or after 5 and 15 days (experiment 2). We examined bacterial community structure using 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing and metabolite profiles using high-pressure liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS). We found little impact as the result of acute exposure to fly ash on the bacterial communities or metabolite profiles in either experiment, suggesting that the bacterial symbiont communities of adults may be relatively resistant to brief contaminant exposure. However, housing frogs in the laboratory altered bacterial community structure in the two experiments, which supports prior research suggesting that environmental source pools are important for maintaining the amphibian skin microbiome. Therefore, for contaminants like fly ash that may alter the potential source pool of symbionts, we think it may be important to explore how contaminants affect the initial assembly of the amphibian skin microbiome in larval amphibians that develop within contaminated sites. IMPORTANCE: Animals are hosts to many symbiotic microorganisms, collectively called the microbiome, that play critical roles in host health. Therefore, environmental contaminants that alter the microbiome may impact hosts. Some of the most widespread contaminants, produced worldwide, are derived from the mining, storage, and combustion of coal for energy. Fly ash, for example, is a by-product of coal combustion. It contains compounds such as arsenic, selenium, cadmium, and strontium and is a recognized source of ground and surface water contamination. Here, we experimentally investigated the impacts of short-term fly ash exposure on the skin microbiome of spring peepers, one of many species of amphibian that sometimes breed in open fly ash disposal ponds. This research provides a look into the potential impacts of fly ash on an animal's microbiome and suggests important future directions for research on the effects of environmental contaminants on the microbiome.

Indexed as

AnuraAnimalsBacteriaBiotaCluster AnalysisCoalDNA, RibosomalEnvironmental PollutantsPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNASkinCoalDNA, RibosomalEnvironmental PollutantsRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID27037118
PMCPMC4959156
OpenAlexW2313612586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.