Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27037044›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychologia2016

Cognitive and connectome properties detectable through individual differences in graphomotor organization.

Melissa Lamar, Olusola Ajilore, Alex Leow, Rebecca Charlton, Jamie Cohen, Johnson GadElkarim, Shaolin Yang, Aifeng Zhang, Randall Davis, Dana Penney and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychologia, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03238001 (Evaluation of DCTclock™ as a Cognitive Assessment Aid), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03238001 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of DCTclock™ as a Cognitive Assessment Aid

TypeinterventionalSponsorDigital Cognition TechnologiesRan2017 to 2017Enrolled450ConditionsCognitive FunctionArmsDCTclock
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Phenotyping Cognitive Impairment using Graphomotor and Latency Features in Digital Clock Drawing Test.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. The significance of negative correlations in brain connectivity.The Journal of comparative neurology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Melissa LamarDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, United States; Graduate Program in Neuroscience, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, United States. Electronic address: mlamar@psych.uic.edu.
Olusola AjiloreDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, United States; Graduate Program in Neuroscience, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, United States.
Alex LeowDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, United States; Department of Bioengineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60607, United States.
Rebecca CharltonDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, United States; Department of Psychology, Goldsmith's University, London, England SE14 6NW, United Kingdom.
Jamie CohenDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, United States.
Johnson GadElkarimDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, United States.
Shaolin YangDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, United States; Department of Bioengineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60607, United States; Department of Radiology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, United States.
Aifeng ZhangDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, United States.
Randall DavisMIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States.
Dana PenneyThe Lahey Clinic, Burlington, MA 01805, United States.
David J LibonDepartment of Geriatrics and Gerontology, New Jersey Institute for Successful Aging, School of Osteopathic Medicine-Rowan University, Stratford, NJ 08084, United States.
Anand KumarDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, United States.
University of Illinois Chicago · USGoldsmiths University of London · GBLahey Hospital and Medical Center · USMassachusetts Institute of Technology · USRowan University · US

Funding

Cortical/Subcortical Circuits in Late-Life DepressionR01MH073989 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI KUMAR, ANAND · 2006 to 2010
$2.6M
The role of myelin & vascular risk on brain structure and function in agingK01AG040192 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI LAMAR, MELISSA · 2012 to 2015
$522k
NIA NIH HHS K01 AG040192NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH073989
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigated whether graphomotor organization during a digitized Clock Drawing Test (dCDT) would be associated with cognitive and/or brain structural differences detected with a tractography-derived structural connectome of the brain. 72 non-demented/non-depressed adults were categorized based on whether or not they used 'anchor' digits (i.e., 12, 3, 6, 9) before any other digits while completing dCDT instructions to "draw the face of a clock with all the numbers and set the hands to 10 after 11". 'Anchorers' were compared to 'non-anchorers' across dCDT, additional cognitive measures and connectome-based metrics. In the context of grossly intact clock drawings, anchorers required fewer strokes to complete the dCDT and outperformed non-anchorers on executive functioning and learning/memory/recognition tasks. Anchorers had higher local efficiency for the left medial orbitofrontal and transverse temporal cortices as well as the right rostral anterior cingulate and superior frontal gyrus versus non-anchorers suggesting better regional integration within local networks involving these regions; select aspects of which correlated with cognition. Results also revealed that anchorers' exhibited a higher degree of modular integration among heteromodal regions of the ventral visual processing stream versus non-anchorers. Thus, an easily observable graphomotor distinction was associated with 1) better performance in specific cognitive domains, 2) higher local efficiency suggesting better regional integration, and 3) more sophisticated modular integration involving the ventral ('what') visuospatial processing stream. Taken together, these results enhance our knowledge of the brain-behavior relationships underlying unprompted graphomotor organization during dCDT.

Indexed as

ConnectomeIndividualityAgedAged, 80 and overAnalysis of VarianceBrainBrain MappingCognitionExecutive FunctionFemaleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsAgingClock drawingDigital Clock drawingExecutive functioningHuman connectomeNeural network

Identifiers

PMID27037044
PMCPMC4853274
OpenAlexW2334831560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.