Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27036995›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2016

Does knee awareness differ between different knee arthroplasty prostheses? A matched, case-control, cross-sectional study.

Morten G Thomsen, Roshan Latifi, Thomas Kallemose, Henrik Husted, Anders Troelsen

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06914960 (Ultrasound-Guided Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06914960 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Ultrasound-Guided Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation Therapy: Effectiveness of 5 Nerve Protocols Versus 3 Nerve and 2 Nerve Protocols - A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorBengu TuremenogullariRan2025 to 2026Enrolled66ConditionsGonarthrosisArms2-point Radiofrequency Ablation, 3-point Radiofrequency Ablation, 5-point Radiofrequency Ablation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Morten G ThomsenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Kettegård Allé 30, 2650, Hvidovre, Denmark. morten@grovethomsen.dk.
Roshan LatifiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Kettegård Allé 30, 2650, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Thomas KallemoseDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Kettegård Allé 30, 2650, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Henrik HustedDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Kettegård Allé 30, 2650, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Anders TroelsenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Kettegård Allé 30, 2650, Hvidovre, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLow knee awareness after Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) has become the ultimate goal in trying to achieve a natural feeling knee that meet patient expectations. To accommodate this manufacturers of TKAs have developed new prosthetic designs that potentially could give patients a more natural feeling knee during activities. The purpose af this study was to compare the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) and Oxford Knee Score (OKS) of patients treated with a previous generation standard Cruciate Retaining (CR) TKA to the scores obtained by patients treated with a newer generation CR TKA or a mobile bearing CR TKA.

methodsWe identified all patients receiving a new generation CR TKA or mobile bearing TKA at our institution between 2010 and 2012. These were matched to a population of patients receiving a standard CR TKA regarding age, gender, year of surgery, Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade and pre- and postoperative knee alignment. Patients were asked to complete the FJS and OKS questionnaires. Of the 316 patients completing the survey 64 standard CR TKAs to 35 new generation CR TKAs and 121 standard CR TKAs to 68 mobile bearing TKAs were matched. The FJS and OKS scores of the three TKA designs were compared.

resultsWhen comparing the new generation CR TKAs to the standard CR TKAs we found statistically significant higher OKS and FJS scores (6 (p = 0.04) and 16 (p = 0.03) points respectively) for the new generation CR TKAs. When comparing the mobile bearing TKAs to the standard CR TKAs we found a statistically significant higher OKS score (3 points, p = 0.04), and a higher but non-significant FJS score (4 points, p = 0.48) for the mobile bearing TKAs.

conclusionsPatients receiving the new generation CR TKA obtained higher FJS and OKS scores when compared to patients receiving a standard CR TKA, indicating that the use of this newer prosthetic design facilitate less knee awareness and better function after TKA.

Indexed as

AwarenessKnee ProsthesisProsthesis DesignAgedArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeBiomechanical PhenomenaCase-Control StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansKnee JointMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionRecovery of FunctionSurveys and QuestionnairesArthroplastyAwarenessDesignFJSKneeOKSRehabilitationTKA

Identifiers

PMID27036995
PMCPMC4818449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.