Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27036993›Full record

Observational studyThe lancet. HIV2016

Retention in care during the first 3 years of antiretroviral therapy for women in Malawi's option B+ programme: an observational cohort study.

Andreas D Haas, Lyson Tenthani, Malango T Msukwa, Kali Tal, Andreas Jahn, Oliver J Gadabu, Adrian Spoerri, Frank Chimbwandira, Joep J van Oosterhout, Olivia Keiser

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The lancet. HIV, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 127 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
127citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
24.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

127 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 175 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

67 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Andreas D HaasInstitute of Social & Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. Electronic address: andreas.haas@ispm.unibe.ch.
Lyson TenthaniInstitute of Social & Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; International Training & Education Center for Health Malawi (I-TECH), Lilongwe, Malawi.
Malango T MsukwaInstitute of Social & Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; The Baobab Health Trust, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Kali TalInstitute of Social & Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Andreas JahnInternational Training & Education Center for Health Malawi (I-TECH), Lilongwe, Malawi; Department of HIV and AIDS, Ministry of Health, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Oliver J GadabuThe Baobab Health Trust, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Adrian SpoerriInstitute of Social & Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Frank ChimbwandiraDepartment of HIV and AIDS, Ministry of Health, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Joep J van OosterhoutDignitas International, Zomba, Malawi; Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi.
Olivia KeiserInstitute of Social & Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine · CHMinistry of Health · MWDignitas International · MWResearch for Equity And Community Health Trust · MWUniversity of Bern · CH

Funding

Observational Antiretroviral Studies In Southern Africa (OASIS) CollaborationU01AI069924 · NIAID · UNIVERSITAT BERN · PI Cleophas Chimbetete, Mary-Ann Davies · 2006 to 2026
$55.9M
NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI069924NIAID NIH HHS U01AI069924PEPFAR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStudies of Malawi's option B+ programme for HIV-positive pregnant and breastfeeding women have reported high loss to follow-up during pregnancy and at the start of antiretroviral therapy (ART), but few data exist about retention during breastfeeding and after weaning. We examined loss to follow-up and retention in care in patients in the option B+ programme during their first 3 years on ART.

methodsWe analysed two data sources: aggregated facility-level data about patients in option B+ who started ART between Oct 1, 2011, and June 30, 2012, at 546 health facilities; and patient-level data from 20 large facilities with electronic medical record system for HIV-positive women who started ART between Sept 1, 2011, and Dec 31, 2013, under option B+ or because they had WHO clinical stages 3 or 4 disease or had CD4 counts of less than 350 cells per μL. We used facility-level data to calculate representative estimates of retention and loss to follow-up. We used patient-level data to study temporal trends in retention, timing of loss to follow-up, and predictors of no follow-up and loss to follow-up. We defined patients who were more than 60 days late for their first follow-up visit as having no follow-up and patients who were more than 60 days late for a subsequent visit as being lost to follow-up. We calculated proportions and cumulative probabilities of patients who had died, stopped ART, had no follow-up, were lost to follow-up, or were retained alive on ART for 36 months. We calculated odds ratios and hazard ratios to examine predictors of no follow-up and loss to follow-up.

findingsAnalysis of facility-level data about patients in option B+ who had not transferred to a different facility showed retention in care to be 76·8% (20 475 of 26,658 patients) after 12 months, 70·8% (18,306 of 25,849 patients) after 24 months, and 69·7% (17,787 of 25,535 patients) after 36 months. Patient-level data included 29,145 patients. 14,630 (50·2%) began treatment under option B+. Patients in option B+ had a higher risk of having no follow-up and, for the first 2 years of ART, higher risk of loss to follow-up than did patients who started ART because they had CD4 counts less than 350 cells per μL or WHO clinical stage 3 or 4 disease. Risk of loss to follow-up during the third year was low and similar for patients retained for 2 years. Retention rates did not change as the option B+ programme matured.

interpretationOur data suggest that pregnant and breastfeeding women who start ART immediately after they are diagnosed with HIV can be retained on ART through the option B+ programme, even after many have stopped breastfeeding. Interventions might be needed to improve retention in the first year on ART in option B+.

fundingBill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Partnerships for Enhanced Engagement in Research Health, and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

Indexed as

Lost to Follow-UpAdolescentAdultAnti-HIV AgentsBreast FeedingCohort StudiesDrug MonitoringFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalMalawiMaternal-Child Health ServicesOdds RatioPatient DropoutsPregnancyAnti-HIV Agents

Identifiers

PMID27036993
PMCPMC4904064
OpenAlexW2294693110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.