Erratum: The evolutionary turnover of recombination hot spots contributes to speciation in mice.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Cell-type-specific genomics reveals histone modification dynamics in mammalian meiosis.Nature communications · 2019
   Article
2. Advocating hormonal treatment to prevent adult in-fertility in patients diagnosed with congenital un-descended testes.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
   Review

Corrections and comments

• Erratum for
  The evolutionary turnover of recombination hot spots contributes to speciation in mice.2016

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Funding

Abstract