ReviewThe Review of scientific instruments2016
Invited Review Article: Pump-probe microscopy.
Review in The Review of scientific instruments, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
56 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Precise measurement of the Kerr coefficient using phase-sensitive pump-probe hyperspectral imaging.The Review of scientific instruments · 2026Article
- Violation of detailed balance in non-equilibrium magnons observed by inelastic neutron scattering.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Galvanometer-scanning transient phase microscopy with balanced detection and arbitrary pump polarization.Journal of the Optical Society of America. B, Optical physics · 2026Article
- Angle-resolved Measurements Reveal the Origin of Signal Anisotropy in Pump-probe Microscopy.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Self-referencing ultrafast wide-field pump-probe microscopy.Nature communications · 2025Article
- On the importance of simultaneous label-free multimodal nonlinear optical imaging for biomedical applications.APL photonics · 2025Article
- Nonlinear optical microscopy with an obscuration-free, freeform reflective objective.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
- Ultrasensitive in vivo infrared spectroscopic imaging via oblique photothermal microscopy.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Evaluation of the Temporal Characteristics of Ultrafast Imaging Methods Using Continuous Chirped Pulse Illumination.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Rapid Wide-Field Correlative Mapping of Electronic and Vibrational Ultrafast Dynamics in Solids.ACS nano · 2025Article
- Noninvasive identification of carbon-based black pigments with pump-probe microscopy.Science advances · 2024Article
- Statistical estimation theory detection limits for label-free imaging.Journal of biomedical optics · 2024Article
- Numerical study of transient absorption saturation in single-layer graphene for optical nanoscopy applications.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Raman scattering and vacuum fluctuation: An Einstein-coefficient-like equation for Raman cross sections.The Journal of chemical physics · 2023Article
- Progress and Prospects in Optical Ultrafast Microscopy in the Visible Spectral Region: Transient Absorption and Two-Dimensional Microscopy.The journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces · 2023Review
- Implication of the double-gating mode in a hybrid photon counting detector for measurements of transient heat conduction in GaAs/AlAs superlattice structures.Journal of applied crystallography · 2023Article
- Broadband synchronization of ultrafast pulse generation with double-walled carbon nanotubes.Nanophotonics (Berlin, Germany) · 2023Article
- Recent Advances in Characterization of Melanin Pigments in Biological Samples.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Nondestructive Nonlinear Optical Microscopy Revealed the Blackening Mechanism of Ancient Chinese Jades.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multiphoton microscopy has rapidly gained popularity in biomedical imaging and materials science because of its ability to provide three-dimensional images at high spatial and temporal resolution even in optically scattering environments. Currently the majority of commercial and home-built devices are based on two-photon fluorescence and harmonic generation contrast. These two contrast mechanisms are relatively easy to measure but can access only a limited range of endogenous targets. Recent developments in fast laser pulse generation, pulse shaping, and detection technology have made accessible a wide range of optical contrasts that utilize multiple pulses of different colors. Molecular excitation with multiple pulses offers a large number of adjustable parameters. For example, in two-pulse pump-probe microscopy, one can vary the wavelength of each excitation pulse, the detection wavelength, the timing between the excitation pulses, and the detection gating window after excitation. Such a large parameter space can provide much greater molecular specificity than existing single-color techniques and allow for structural and functional imaging without the need for exogenous dyes and labels, which might interfere with the system under study. In this review, we provide a tutorial overview, covering principles of pump-probe microscopy and experimental setup, challenges associated with signal detection and data processing, and an overview of applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.