Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27036592›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2016

Split Bregman multicoil accelerated reconstruction technique: A new framework for rapid reconstruction of cardiac perfusion MRI.

Srikant Kamesh Iyer, Tolga Tasdizen, Devavrat Likhite, Edward DiBella

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Accelerated free-breathing 3D T1ρ cardiovascular magnetic resonance using multicoil compressed sensing.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Srikant Kamesh IyerElectrical and Computer Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112; Scientific Computing and Imaging Institute (SCI), University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112; and UCAIR, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84108.
Tolga TasdizenElectrical and Computer Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 and Scientific Computing and Imaging Institute (SCI), University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112.
Devavrat LikhiteElectrical and Computer Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 and UCAIR, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84108.
Edward DiBellaUCAIR, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84108.

Funding

Quantitative cardiac MRI perfusion for longitudinal studiesR01HL113224 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI DIBELLA, EDWARD VR · 2012 to 2015
$2.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL113224
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRapid reconstruction of undersampled multicoil MRI data with iterative constrained reconstruction method is a challenge. The authors sought to develop a new substitution based variable splitting algorithm for faster reconstruction of multicoil cardiac perfusion MRI data.

methodsThe new method, split Bregman multicoil accelerated reconstruction technique (SMART), uses a combination of split Bregman based variable splitting and iterative reweighting techniques to achieve fast convergence. Total variation constraints are used along the spatial and temporal dimensions. The method is tested on nine ECG-gated dog perfusion datasets, acquired with a 30-ray golden ratio radial sampling pattern and ten ungated human perfusion datasets, acquired with a 24-ray golden ratio radial sampling pattern. Image quality and reconstruction speed are evaluated and compared to a gradient descent (GD) implementation and to multicoil k-t SLR, a reconstruction technique that uses a combination of sparsity and low rank constraints.

resultsComparisons based on blur metric and visual inspection showed that SMART images had lower blur and better texture as compared to the GD implementation. On average, the GD based images had an ∼18% higher blur metric as compared to SMART images. Reconstruction of dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) cardiac perfusion images using the SMART method was ∼6 times faster than standard gradient descent methods. k-t SLR and SMART produced images with comparable image quality, though SMART was ∼6.8 times faster than k-t SLR.

conclusionsThe SMART method is a promising approach to reconstruct good quality multicoil images from undersampled DCE cardiac perfusion data rapidly.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingPerfusion ImagingAccelerationAnimalsCardiac-Gated Imaging TechniquesDogsHeartHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID27036592
PMCPMC4818275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.